linux-s390.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dust.li" <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>,
	kgraul@linux.ibm.com, wenjia@linux.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net/smc: Introduce a specific sysctl for TEST_LINK time
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:55:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220920045520.GC108825@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1663642434-30035-1-git-send-email-guwen@linux.alibaba.com>

On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 10:53:54AM +0800, Wen Gu wrote:
>SMC-R tests the viability of link by sending out TEST_LINK LLC
>messages over RoCE fabric when connections on link have been
>idle for a time longer than keepalive interval (testlink time).
>
>But using tcp_keepalive_time as testlink time maybe not quite
>suitable because it is default no less than two hours[1], which
>is too long for single link to find peer dead. The active host
>will still use peer-dead link (QP) sending messages, and can't
>find out until get IB_WC_RETRY_EXC_ERR error CQEs, which takes
>more time than TEST_LINK timeout (SMC_LLC_WAIT_TIME) normally.
>
>So this patch introduces a independent sysctl for SMC-R to set
>link keepalive time, in order to detect link down in time. The
>default value is 30 seconds.
>
>[1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1122#page-101
>
>Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
>---
> Documentation/networking/smc-sysctl.rst |  7 +++++++
> include/net/netns/smc.h                 |  1 +
> net/smc/smc_llc.c                       |  2 +-
> net/smc/smc_llc.h                       |  1 +
> net/smc/smc_sysctl.c                    | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/Documentation/networking/smc-sysctl.rst b/Documentation/networking/smc-sysctl.rst
>index 742e90e..f8c3d59 100644
>--- a/Documentation/networking/smc-sysctl.rst
>+++ b/Documentation/networking/smc-sysctl.rst
>@@ -34,3 +34,10 @@ smcr_buf_type - INTEGER
>         - 1 - Use virtually contiguous buffers
>         - 2 - Mixed use of the two types. Try physically contiguous buffers first.
>           If not available, use virtually contiguous buffers then.
>+
>+smcr_testlink_time - INTEGER
>+	How frequently SMC-R link sends out TEST_LINK LLC messages to confirm
>+	viability, after the last activity of connections on it. The maximum
>+	value is (INT_MAX / HZ) seconds, the minimum value is 1 second.
>+
>+	Default: 30 seconds.
>diff --git a/include/net/netns/smc.h b/include/net/netns/smc.h
>index 2adbe2b..d295e2c 100644
>--- a/include/net/netns/smc.h
>+++ b/include/net/netns/smc.h
>@@ -19,5 +19,6 @@ struct netns_smc {
> #endif
> 	unsigned int			sysctl_autocorking_size;
> 	unsigned int			sysctl_smcr_buf_type;
>+	int				sysctl_smcr_testlink_time;
> };
> #endif
>diff --git a/net/smc/smc_llc.c b/net/smc/smc_llc.c
>index 175026a..388bd2e 100644
>--- a/net/smc/smc_llc.c
>+++ b/net/smc/smc_llc.c
>@@ -2127,7 +2127,7 @@ void smc_llc_lgr_init(struct smc_link_group *lgr, struct smc_sock *smc)
> 	init_waitqueue_head(&lgr->llc_flow_waiter);
> 	init_waitqueue_head(&lgr->llc_msg_waiter);
> 	mutex_init(&lgr->llc_conf_mutex);
>-	lgr->llc_testlink_time = READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_keepalive_time);
>+	lgr->llc_testlink_time = READ_ONCE(net->smc.sysctl_smcr_testlink_time) * HZ;
> }
> 
> /* called after lgr was removed from lgr_list */
>diff --git a/net/smc/smc_llc.h b/net/smc/smc_llc.h
>index 4404e52..1de9a29 100644
>--- a/net/smc/smc_llc.h
>+++ b/net/smc/smc_llc.h
>@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> 
> #define SMC_LLC_WAIT_FIRST_TIME		(5 * HZ)
> #define SMC_LLC_WAIT_TIME		(2 * HZ)
>+#define SMC_LLC_TESTLINK_DEFAULT_TIME	30

I'm wondering why we don't follow the upper to macros using (30 * HZ) ?


> 
> enum smc_llc_reqresp {
> 	SMC_LLC_REQ,
>diff --git a/net/smc/smc_sysctl.c b/net/smc/smc_sysctl.c
>index 0613868..7f68520 100644
>--- a/net/smc/smc_sysctl.c
>+++ b/net/smc/smc_sysctl.c
>@@ -16,8 +16,12 @@
> 
> #include "smc.h"
> #include "smc_core.h"
>+#include "smc_llc.h"
> #include "smc_sysctl.h"
> 
>+static int smcr_testlink_time_min = 1;
>+static int smcr_testlink_time_max = (INT_MAX / HZ);
>+
> static struct ctl_table smc_table[] = {
> 	{
> 		.procname       = "autocorking_size",
>@@ -35,6 +39,15 @@
> 		.extra1		= SYSCTL_ZERO,
> 		.extra2		= SYSCTL_TWO,
> 	},
>+	{
>+		.procname	= "smcr_testlink_time",
>+		.data		= &init_net.smc.sysctl_smcr_testlink_time,
>+		.maxlen		= sizeof(int),
>+		.mode		= 0644,
>+		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec_minmax,
>+		.extra1		= &smcr_testlink_time_min,
>+		.extra2		= &smcr_testlink_time_max,
>+	},
> 	{  }
> };
> 
>@@ -60,6 +73,7 @@ int __net_init smc_sysctl_net_init(struct net *net)
> 
> 	net->smc.sysctl_autocorking_size = SMC_AUTOCORKING_DEFAULT_SIZE;
> 	net->smc.sysctl_smcr_buf_type = SMCR_PHYS_CONT_BUFS;
>+	net->smc.sysctl_smcr_testlink_time = SMC_LLC_TESTLINK_DEFAULT_TIME;
> 
> 	return 0;
> 
>-- 
>1.8.3.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-20  4:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-20  2:45 [PATCH net-next 0/2] Separate SMC parameter settings from TCP sysctls Wen Gu
2022-09-20  2:53 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] net/smc: Introduce a specific sysctl for TEST_LINK time Wen Gu
2022-09-20  2:57   ` Tony Lu
2022-09-20  4:55   ` dust.li [this message]
2022-09-20  6:23     ` Wen Gu
2022-09-20  8:21       ` dust.li
2022-09-20  9:03         ` Wen Gu
2022-09-20  2:54 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] net/smc: Unbind r/w buffer size from clcsock and make them tunable Wen Gu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220920045520.GC108825@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).