From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A27C433EB for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 12:56:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA0B20720 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 12:56:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726872AbgGJM4k (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2020 08:56:40 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:44960 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727919AbgGJM4j (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2020 08:56:39 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0381FB; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 05:56:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.37.12.58] (unknown [10.37.12.58]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FC3C3F8C6; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 05:56:35 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] memory: samsung: exynos5422-dmc: Adjust polling interval and uptreshold To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Chanwoo Choi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, willy.mh.wolff.ml@gmail.com, k.konieczny@samsung.com, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com, chanwoo@kernel.org, myungjoo.ham@samsung.com, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, s.nawrocki@samsung.com, kgene@kernel.org References: <20200708153420.29484-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com> <20200708153420.29484-2-lukasz.luba@arm.com> <20200710124503.GB22897@pi3> From: Lukasz Luba Message-ID: <0bfb4332-9a2e-9ff9-1a86-d9875a8f34bb@arm.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:56:33 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200710124503.GB22897@pi3> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org On 7/10/20 1:45 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 09:34:45AM +0100, Lukasz Luba wrote: >> Hi Chanwoo, >> >> On 7/9/20 5:08 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >>> Hi Lukasz, >>> >>> On 7/9/20 12:34 AM, Lukasz Luba wrote: >>>> In order to react faster and make better decisions under some workloads, >>>> benchmarking the memory subsystem behavior, adjust the polling interval >>>> and upthreshold value used by the simple_ondemand governor. >>>> >>>> Reported-by: Willy Wolff >>>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba >>>> --- >>>> drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c | 4 ++-- >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c b/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c >>>> index 93e9c2429c0d..e03ee35f0ab5 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c >>>> @@ -1466,10 +1466,10 @@ static int exynos5_dmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>>> * Setup default thresholds for the devfreq governor. >>>> * The values are chosen based on experiments. >>>> */ >>>> - dmc->gov_data.upthreshold = 30; >>>> + dmc->gov_data.upthreshold = 10; >>>> dmc->gov_data.downdifferential = 5; >>>> - exynos5_dmc_df_profile.polling_ms = 500; >>>> + exynos5_dmc_df_profile.polling_ms = 100; >>>> } >>>> >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi >>> >> >> Thank you for the review. Do you think this patch could go through >> your tree together with your patches? >> >> I don't know Krzysztof's opinion about the patch 2/2, but >> I would expect, assuming the patch itself is correct, he would >> like to take it into his next/dt branch. > > In the cover letter you mentioned that this is a follow up for the > Chanwoo's patchset. But are these patches really depending on it? Can > they be picked up independently? They are not heavily dependent on Chanwoo's patches. Yes, they can be picked up independently. I just wanted to mention that the patch 1/2 was produced on the code base which had already applied Chanwoo's patch for DMC. If you like to take both 1/2 and 2/2 into your tree, it's good. Thank you for having a look on this. Regards, Lukasz > > The DTS patch must go through arm soc, so I will take it. If it really > depends on driver changes, then it has to wait for next release. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >