From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31225C433DF for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:26:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D742074D for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:26:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1598257601; bh=Z5v3yALan58X82pcXsq2Jd8sMAElN8QVKUbO2NvOlRg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=p8Tk6eEK+CL7pa/rWlkry22ffVBzuyZPCpv9/fxzRSG0Yin3O2oGr2B8tWWLU2tte yXu+WbyBPUkCc+q0FeC/PNeRM4IvSNAP/Er625VcTNRtcCzDJdFWrXcJmNJIcB0skD hr0R3EEfSYiikVwTNXdaLo367IFlgaOUb3aOnkhI= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726631AbgHXI0k (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Aug 2020 04:26:40 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com ([209.85.221.67]:36868 "EHLO mail-wr1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726580AbgHXI0k (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Aug 2020 04:26:40 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id y3so7744775wrl.4; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 01:26:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=EwnSSERLhwr59xH9xxkGQsLVrHFbS0iVSLa9oXTssQk=; b=YvAiqwspAmuXiL5s6NXaoIOF7kqM7eENiu4/xt+fLd5D0OmZaKtebJTGgoLIo/5N1G CF+bhSSlDsu/ThNuuejVpQqF9KkKVUIMIZCZpE/4FGYL1QIRar4OOhap+hy76ICDJp8v 6KBGfSEk8HkSISwzz1QTBU8fSRZio8pJVyD/pFqfRouhtYy0PzicuYHb5oSBYwIBKcby 8YiCoqdhR9O/AAt+DQoj4YgxKtfKMQUb5aZ6HBAyuqsq6ywE4DzyhK/+Xqoa2fr0Fb9L MTRQYRG2UFP2iopBMCVrmwwLmcIZ/9Er5W4l3oTPtLLd0tOZ6M9U5U/Hu/i3HBTue276 W8IQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Q/NvyXjvs0PMm0aISfz8THiPYt1+jbKq2+VNJbhNGuuoGJp8w 4fRmw4MTn8Z+LIvvNopJXU0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyfwbFUcMPFowdfSohjmf5Een0Qin2LUBTL30LqpiJthvHEC+F/P+baWuv3HPZCiDCL8xSSCg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:a11d:: with SMTP id o29mr4769908wro.421.1598257597768; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 01:26:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kozik-lap ([194.230.155.216]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id m1sm22173394wmc.28.2020.08.24.01.26.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 24 Aug 2020 01:26:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:26:35 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Daniel Lezcano Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Marek Szyprowski , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Lorenzo Pieralisi , Lukasz Luba Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] cpuidle: big.LITTLE: enable driver only on Peach-Pit/Pi Chromebooks Message-ID: <20200824082635.GA15030@kozik-lap> References: <20200616081230.31198-1-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <20200616081230.31198-3-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <20200817153908.GA13144@kozik-lap> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:15:42AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 17/08/2020 17:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 12:05:46PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > >> > >> On 6/16/20 10:12 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > >>> This driver always worked properly only on the Exynos 5420/5800 based > >>> Chromebooks (Peach-Pit/Pi), so change the required compatible string to > >>> the 'google,peach', to avoid enabling it on the other Exynos 542x/5800 > >>> boards, which hangs in such case. The main difference between Peach-Pit/Pi > >>> and other Exynos 542x/5800 boards is the firmware - Peach platform doesn't > >>> use secure firmware at all. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > > > > This patch waited on list for almost two months and was not picked up. > > Therefore I'll take it for v5.10. > > It happens some patches can fall into the cracks, especially when we are > fully busy with a peak of work. Also, we have filters in our mailers > which are not perfect. A gentle ping is enough to ask to pay attention > to the series. > > I can understand that is annoying, but preemptively pick the patch is > not adequate. I apologize if my message was harsh or sounded rude. That was not my intention. I understand that patches soometimes got missed. That's life. This patch here is quite simple, non-intrusive, got independent ack. Also in the past SoC-specific drivers were sometimes going through SoC tree (so in this case - mine for Samsung). Patch also blocks the dependant DT change (for entire cycle). Therefore I guessed that it won't be a problem and it is just simpler to apply it. If it is an issue, I can drop it and rebase my branch. Best regards, Krzysztof