From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79C79C55178 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 12:58:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB22206D5 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 12:58:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ziepe.ca header.i=@ziepe.ca header.b="SpM7chHf" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727393AbgKFM6p (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 07:58:45 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57754 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727391AbgKFM6m (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 07:58:42 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-x844.google.com (mail-qt1-x844.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::844]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACC71C0613D4 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 04:58:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qt1-x844.google.com with SMTP id p12so633209qtp.7 for ; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 04:58:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ziepe.ca; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=LDmpY5Q3jeo13aLjq8mpu4vGc1arJjADg5EChwDGndg=; b=SpM7chHfdZV7h7CKnja31DtYMLYzvOBfAlRtmJ/n/nmTfwC0/x656sMJMRCmtcchj/ ZyUoXciqxn2yvqmwaFJGHZpzSVxZGn6Ze+JMY7srqI9JIuOIozv+IXpP8Z+LAF7g6ch/ geDIF/iCN2g4ZH9VZGIJGVBqjOuzBGBXOfBZNRG4f137xGwffeFnYlpuanA0eFi1/Rzl pE4g37GMMac8kgjZ4ctH1Noi6iDIudZDIDNiFDVJFDqddViW7d1FfR7i1JICWyRJ9Ug1 S57hfmUNM5E/OZ/BlY/n0jaRZ1v6nFt9MTt+r5sEgovuILshM1zaV3phLFg35dveDz2Q NHAw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=LDmpY5Q3jeo13aLjq8mpu4vGc1arJjADg5EChwDGndg=; b=YPIzS+irmX3IgAbJzM1VNg7X02RRF0z8tcjg3+vmNcD5JzAfiSF36mmYd3PnFsloz0 EAGQ+gZRRHMlkqgGKJet/6Dpr+w2ayIPlqU/NC/foYrw8gfNlt2jOl+rXz9DZ4pVjG48 Nb+tAPe/ugQM/UXb1z5FaIjg7mUiYkkb4fag1pDZGSn1r/hlws6iQAgfGWO3BgL5WcRM cOEEXt+alLaEP905QGw04jBPnfVG+dJ3pXvHSzr15/+M6CxG4Kj/vDKHoAMyIqr+rcCV 3MgH86U21DyM9/PMvjZO7oL9mdjNdagJ5TxxwNj+RYEEvVdWaqOoDI+nvpgMHjBaIy7F agtA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531uEXwpvyg8tr/KTHgg3ocIXPGcTCDA9PEtysuTtcylV1DLL5q3 mJ/avQR22hkrrCloEZiwUEZZ/g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw+rwYTMNOCDOtELAS3ZURAM14wn0+raNRbu4MJsphc7No8hlqtgP1VZD/3115+BJAOILEwww== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:74c:: with SMTP id k12mr1292900qth.32.1604667521864; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 04:58:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from ziepe.ca (hlfxns017vw-156-34-48-30.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.ns.bellaliant.net. [156.34.48.30]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o63sm432040qkd.96.2020.11.06.04.58.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 06 Nov 2020 04:58:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from jgg by mlx with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kb1KC-000leP-L9; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 08:58:40 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 08:58:40 -0400 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Daniel Vetter Cc: John Hubbard , Christoph Hellwig , J??r??me Glisse , linux-samsung-soc , Jan Kara , Pawel Osciak , KVM list , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , LKML , DRI Development , Tomasz Figa , Linux MM , Kyungmin Park , Daniel Vetter , Andrew Morton , Marek Szyprowski , Dan Williams , Linux ARM , "open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/15] mm/frame-vector: Use FOLL_LONGTERM Message-ID: <20201106125840.GP36674@ziepe.ca> References: <20201104162125.GA13007@infradead.org> <20201104163758.GA17425@infradead.org> <20201104164119.GA18218@infradead.org> <20201104181708.GU36674@ziepe.ca> <20201105092524.GQ401619@phenom.ffwll.local> <20201105124950.GZ36674@ziepe.ca> <7ae3486d-095e-cf4e-6b0f-339d99709996@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 11:01:57AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > gpu drivers also tend to use vmf_insert_pfn* directly, so we can do > on-demand paging and move buffers around. From what I glanced for > lowest level we to the pte_mkspecial correctly (I think I convinced > myself that vm_insert_pfn does that), but for pud/pmd levels it seems > just yolo. > > remap_pfn_range seems to indeed split down to pte level always. Thats what it looked like to me too. > > From my reading, yes. See ioremap_try_huge_pmd(). > > The ioremap here shouldn't matter, since this is for kernel-internal > mappings. So that's all fine I think. Right, sorry to be unclear, we are talking about io_remap_pfn_range() which is for userspace mappings in VMAs Jason