From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B14A0C64E7B for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:19:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9F2221E9 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389074AbgLBRTf (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2020 12:19:35 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38520 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389070AbgLBRTf (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2020 12:19:35 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 09:18:52 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1606929534; bh=gdrIoUwM4Jc/bJ/Co4EbSzcZQeThPm4Zexr4TFqA+CM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=oBN3nitMLZKbd6AWlOeY3V9jesJoJpzC+hiz6NaZY21ZoXjGC+0jhss9M1MNakmaw K0jlcJAPBGJP5evgjM8/V6GCtJ4sAAzwUrsBQ8Fg5lE+nh+jK32xSWsT5ABnAJ2ggl /TvUmkv9rnLcfbTgbcezyUFVU2ZWFxJ6b6z+KM7E= From: Jakub Kicinski To: Lukasz Stelmach Cc: Andrew Lunn , jim.cromie@gmail.com, Heiner Kallweit , "David S. Miller" , Rob Herring , Kukjin Kim , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Russell King , netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?B?QmFydMWCb21pZWogxbtvbG5pZXJr?= =?UTF-8?B?aWV3aWN6?= , Marek Szyprowski Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] net: ax88796c: ASIX AX88796C SPI Ethernet Adapter Driver Message-ID: <20201202091852.69a02069@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.DHCP.thefacebook.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20201125132621.628ac98b@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 02 Dec 2020 11:46:28 +0100 Lukasz Stelmach wrote: > >> + status = netif_rx(skb); > > > > If I'm reading things right this is in process context, so netif_rx_ni() > > > > Is it? The stack looks as follows > > ax88796c_skb_return() > ax88796c_rx_fixup() > ax88796c_receive() > ax88796c_process_isr() > ax88796c_work() > > and ax88796c_work() is a scheduled in the system_wq. Are you asking if work queue gets run in process context? It does. > >> + if (status != NET_RX_SUCCESS) > >> + netif_info(ax_local, rx_err, ndev, > >> + "netif_rx status %d\n", status); > > > > Again, it's inadvisable to put per packet prints without any rate > > limiting in the data path. > > Even if limmited by the msglvl flag, which is off by default? I'd err on the side of caution, but up to you.