From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F2D0C433E6 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:25:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1B120C56 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:25:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="ECtC8Qr2" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727971AbgH1IZb (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Aug 2020 04:25:31 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55672 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726643AbgH1IZZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Aug 2020 04:25:25 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1044.google.com (mail-pj1-x1044.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1044]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF72FC061264; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 01:25:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1044.google.com with SMTP id nv17so190976pjb.3; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 01:25:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hgp9U9Y/G0zo5rd2YjDP3ShdcPx6s9r42iPuJEDI0jc=; b=ECtC8Qr2QpWVT5Ln1YYdt0d41D8iu4+1QljOFImcKWuMAAwp02hB9Z/uL8VN2ey2J+ p3GD3wlvEExKnV3Z319A58NvE45esf1chM+0V/fjhkBUwXersN3vaLphhdr1J4difc+p 0CAUiHbAVl9ixDZFHnIBUOaHukXywdJoUMvTFy3YA0YF9c3y5XU82ueUeX/Egnq+CmRC 9hNwIbKnSRxOMPUVO8etY6uZgLfo6aqikvMDuvVT9IqO2gK9kJBCJF/qz+RdRz2245Vy DFaJDmcxFVDbDqen+wlr2csyHQ1eWpt/RK7KSuNhW3eyhUvIV3DI9LK5Mo5H9XXISrU7 E5/A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hgp9U9Y/G0zo5rd2YjDP3ShdcPx6s9r42iPuJEDI0jc=; b=pctQx0EBEnxpYdTF8BTf/T8OmcYKWNG+l71XLGbNh4QWNPrKoPDqFrhe8NWAtpl0jd NtwgLkYIvS0C/IUdRpCyLGd2Wpcu7M9i59xEi9YyCDeeS6b3Gw8pDrQfhyocDxydNhFz Jo5ZMckd8nquGjRM+caow/WxlT54OZqMCSOBMuBUX4Xh78s2wBEqARBW9zkjK6AIl8h5 twpROwDA0LeYzmInsp1iaoRsyed4HZeYSPAuJ7bJjkLDfkhViV8nmVPoDyB5ul6i5LlT XpLe5KfjwiVX88anWzUZoerUuJxiufLhkReJ+fCPwibw1WLcpL35YlU49+cgg0dguVJ+ I00g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532arx/TYS8Jx1jO+bgzgdWVixMm7e+LzER+rpPI/sNpsmJUJX3R W7m9U+x/DebwJHlHCbNdndv4QHn3KP5GF9LJ44E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwsbuw20O2OB1p5m5faNM+P4s8DD8aLK8TuvYw3gq+cYE8m/WMyHxDzBvhpeh/QCh5ExRey2Xy2BFReiumdd/0= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b194:: with SMTP id s20mr408970plr.321.1598603123368; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 01:25:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200827192642.1725-1-krzk@kernel.org> <20200827192642.1725-9-krzk@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 11:25:06 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/18] iio: afe: iio-rescale: Simplify with dev_err_probe() To: Peter Rosin Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Jonathan Cameron , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Kukjin Kim , Michael Hennerich , Kevin Hilman , Neil Armstrong , Jerome Brunet , Martin Blumenstingl , Marek Vasut , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Beniamin Bia , Tomasz Duszynski , Linus Walleij , linux-iio , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arm Mailing List , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 12:46 AM Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2020-08-27 21:26, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: ... > I'm not a huge fan of adding *one* odd line breaking the 80 column > recommendation to any file. I like to be able to fit multiple > windows side by side in a meaningful way. Also, I don't like having > a shitload of emptiness on my screen, which is what happens when some > lines are longer and you want to see it all. I strongly believe that > the 80 column rule/recommendation is still as valid as it ever was. > It's just hard to read longish lines; there's a reason newspapers > columns are quite narrow... Why not to introduce 66 (or so, like TeX recommends)? Or even less? I consider any comparison to news or natural language text is silly. Programming language is different in many aspects, including helpful scripts and utilities to browse the source code. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko