From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21124C432C0 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 19:59:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8FC214AF for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 19:59:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="InHq5aiL" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728120AbfLBT7n (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Dec 2019 14:59:43 -0500 Received: from mail-il1-f195.google.com ([209.85.166.195]:47027 "EHLO mail-il1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727586AbfLBT7m (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Dec 2019 14:59:42 -0500 Received: by mail-il1-f195.google.com with SMTP id t17so815051ilm.13; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 11:59:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/1GIiVAt9IkBpoZ9Uj4zenbh/EnV7XYXqjcP5Gkayek=; b=InHq5aiL3hR9tFDnhuqx6aayq30VOPnHw69PCMZh0fSzKM55HtwqVJl0b4YhHu7o0S +vKSRzTuJwrb/lXpHGExaIBaelO+6e1no2J7UB2BWeJc2O8zSrV6zrjf11Joenv7+K+O bIOK66rwnalFLRsaiCMoP1L5Q+Gri2cgksvOUQua6x2NZ9JNO0modjT5LhxhvqbmC8dc 2FZZWCxZ4UxsFPSHkDVN45m1Rxjv8DMuTLQZdROk5eqrpDHYKSl4SPzzPtiTLnQvNG4L Gdc25pYlvp0qSQqCaGqVXUgLhtnumBY8uup6p7tMk8yK2DpH0DcOK17AODcn1FefgjKv oLRA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/1GIiVAt9IkBpoZ9Uj4zenbh/EnV7XYXqjcP5Gkayek=; b=EP9OBlmFSylY4Q11Sems+Yi8x1vH/6WD5rWtnltu/NMokHQvz/wQutueTHejM0txvi Ifgw9montiJScWkTuzdjPJI3FlRiSmJZ55clpxm0gCdwYFoQrjZk4v/dRkkrIzYkkvnE ZpItF8eu8iFIS+xvnwf2EpmUSbt+VemT7s6LXCjpIp4Tm0TJUetFRPPqX5gkrctYKAhR dB6IMSI4AJRysKUm2nkxMJoeFpxTemzIrxVUup2fi/Wz6fEkBkYqE4lEHcjbKXbDKhHB SHjPZMYYQThj3wnnyP3OHGI+igAwOd6XFOS5Hl/tk2AdEfmGJCkbdqu4tUMQxhiBUoCs uChA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUIh0yZnbqSI8B6EekfzYDRarb9+pI6514M5jb54TU5mwHvouw7 4j50BaqCMxOzBxr04tPygL0ijzSdVELnsqlZijM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx6YUMOUm+z16ig9xldwuTeM19+Bd22B3aBAblOLhFaOGglg7N1XrSehMoTWzvuuSea3OH9TLlXRGuqdFXhTE0= X-Received: by 2002:a92:4891:: with SMTP id j17mr565262ilg.33.1575316780879; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 11:59:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191202193230.21310-1-sam@ravnborg.org> In-Reply-To: <20191202193230.21310-1-sam@ravnborg.org> From: Jeffrey Hugo Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 12:59:29 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/26] drm/panel infrastructure + backlight update To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" , Thierry Reding , Laurent Pinchart , Neil Armstrong , David Airlie , Linus Walleij , Stefan Agner , Andrzej Hajda , Benjamin Gaignard , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Tomi Valkeinen , Jagan Teki , NXP Linux Team , Jitao Shi , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Abhinav Kumar , linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Sean Paul , Linux ARM , Purism Kernel Team , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Boris Brezillon , Daniel Vetter Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 12:33 PM Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > This patchset include a couple of different > things - all related to panels. > > - The panel callbacks are optional - so drop error if > callback is not present. > > - Add support for backlight in drm_panel. > This allows us to make much simpler backlight > support to most panels. > The patchset include conversion of most of the > trivial cases. > > - Drop drm_connector from drm_panel. > This change required many changes to most > panels and many bridges and display drivers. > This is by far the most invasive change in this patchset. > > - Drop the unused get_timings() callback. > No users, so no need to keep it around. > > With this patchset drm_panel_(attach|detach) are nop's > but they are kept for now. > > A few of these patches has been sent out before - but versioning > started again from v1 - as the most patches are new. > > I have tested the panel-simple changes, and thus some > of the infrastructure changes. > The testing was done on an earlier iteration - and I ended > up submitting this as Laurent and others started to depend on it. > Jitao has a patch to add more callbacks, and I wanted the > simplification of the callbacks before we add more callbacks. > > Sam > > > Sam Ravnborg (26): > drm/drm_panel: no error when no callback > drm/panel: add backlight support > drm/panel: simple: use drm_panel backlight support > drm: get drm_bridge_panel connector via helper > drm/panel: add drm_connector argument to get_modes() > drm/panel: decouple connector from drm_panel > drm/panel: remove get_timings > drm/panel: drop drm_device from drm_panel > drm/panel: feiyang-fy07024di26a30d: use drm_panel backlight support > drm/panel: ilitek-ili9881c: use drm_panel backlight support > drm/panel: innolux-p079zca: use drm_panel backlight support > drm/panel: kingdisplay-kd097d04: use drm_panel backlight support > drm/panel: lvds: use drm_panel backlight support > drm/panel: olimex-lcd-olinuxino: use drm_panel backlight support > drm/panel: osd-osd101t2587-53ts: use drm_panel backlight support > drm/panel: panasonic-vvx10f034n00: use drm_panel backlight support > drm/panel: raydium-rm68200: use drm_panel backlight support > drm/panel: rocktech-jh057n00900: use drm_panel backlight support > drm/panel: ronbo-rb070d30: use drm_panel backlight support > drm/panel: seiko-43wvf1g: use drm_panel backlight support > drm/panel: sharp-lq101r1sx01: use drm_panel backlight support > drm/panel: sharp-ls043t1le01: use drm_panel backlight support > drm/panel: sitronix-st7701: use drm_panel backlight support > drm/panel: sitronix-st7789v: use drm_panel backlight support > drm/panel: tpo-td028ttec1: use drm_panel backlight support > drm/panel: tpo-tpg110: use drm_panel backlight support > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix-anx6345.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/panel.c | 18 +++- > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8622.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358764.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358767.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel.c | 96 ++++++++++++++---- > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dpi.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/fsl-dcu/fsl_dcu_drm_rgb.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/imx/parallel-display.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 2 +- > .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/mdp4/mdp4_lvds_connector.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_manager.c | 2 +- How come the diff stat in the cover letter here indicates a change to this file, yet I cannot find a change to this file in any of the patches? What am I missing?