From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
Will McVicker <willmcvicker@google.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
"Cc: Android Kernel" <kernel-team@android.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] arm64: Kconfig: Update ARCH_EXYNOS select configs
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 12:51:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YVWkxnc8wTdBgRsv@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+Ln22EbXKsRFZ=3L4A_jqciRxG2hnAh9iKTfQ_Ypr2NJgDzQQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 30 Sep 2021, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> 2021年9月30日(木) 18:23 Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>:
> >
> > I've taken the liberty of cherry-picking some of the points you have
> > reiteratted a few times. Hopefully I can help to address them
> > adequently.
> >
> > On Thu, 30 Sep 2021, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > Reminder: these are essential drivers and all Exynos platforms must have
> > > them as built-in (at least till someone really tests this on multiple
> > > setups).
> >
> > > Therefore I don't agree with calling it a "problem" that we select
> > > *necessary* drivers for supported platforms. It's by design - supported
> > > platforms should receive them without ability to remove.
> >
> > > The selected drivers are essential for supported platforms.
> >
> > SoC specific drivers are only essential/necessary/required in
> > images designed to execute solely on a platform that requires them.
> > For a kernel image which is designed to be generic i.e. one that has
> > the ability to boot on vast array of platforms, the drivers simply
> > have to be *available*.
> >
> > Forcing all H/W drivers that are only *potentially* utilised on *some*
> > platforms as core binary built-ins doesn't make any technical sense.
> > The two most important issues this causes are image size and a lack of
> > configurability/flexibility relating to real-world application i.e.
> > the one issue we already agreed upon; H/W or features that are too
> > new (pre-release).
> >
> > Bloating a generic kernel with potentially hundreds of unnecessary
> > drivers that will never be executed in the vast majority of instances
> > doesn't achieve anything. If we have a kernel image that has the
> > ability to boot on 10's of architectures which have 10's of platforms
> > each, that's a whole host of unused/wasted executable space.
> >
> > In order for vendors to work more closely with upstream, they need the
> > ability to over-ride a *few* drivers to supplement them with some
> > functionality which they believe provides them with a competitive edge
> > (I think you called this "value-add" before) prior to the release of a
> > device. This is a requirement that cannot be worked around.
>
> [Chiming in as a clock driver sub-maintainer and someone who spent a
> non-insignificant part of his life on SoC driver bring-up - not as a
> Google employee.]
>
> I'd argue that the proper way for them to achieve it would be to
> extend the upstream frameworks and/or existing drivers with
> appropriate APIs to allow their downstream modules to plug into what's
> already available upstream.
Is that the same as exporting symbols to framework APIs?
Since this is already a method GKI uses to allow external modules to
interact with the core kernel/frameworks. However, it's not possible
to upstream these without an upstream user for each one.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-30 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-28 23:56 [PATCH v2 00/12] arm64: Kconfig: Update ARCH_EXYNOS select configs Will McVicker
2021-09-28 23:56 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] arm64: don't have ARCH_EXYNOS select EXYNOS_CHIPID Will McVicker
2021-09-29 13:58 ` (subset) " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-09-29 14:00 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-09-28 23:56 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] timekeeping: add API for getting timekeeping_suspended Will McVicker
2021-09-29 3:42 ` John Stultz
2021-09-29 20:01 ` Will McVicker
2021-09-29 20:46 ` John Stultz
2021-09-30 18:31 ` Will McVicker
2021-09-28 23:56 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] clk: samsung: add support for CPU clocks Will McVicker
2021-09-28 23:56 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] clk: samsung: exynos5433: update apollo and atlas clock probing Will McVicker
2021-09-28 23:56 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] clk: export __clk_lookup Will McVicker
2021-10-08 4:31 ` Stephen Boyd
2021-09-28 23:56 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] clk: samsung: modularize exynos arm64 clk drivers Will McVicker
2021-09-28 23:56 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] clk: samsung: set exynos arm64 clk driver as tristate Will McVicker
2021-09-29 13:09 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-09-28 23:56 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] pinctrl: samsung: modularize the ARM and ARM64 pinctrls Will McVicker
2021-09-29 2:01 ` Chanho Park
2021-09-28 23:56 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] pinctrl: samsung: set PINCTRL_EXYNOS and PINCTRL_SAMSUNG as tristate Will McVicker
2021-09-28 23:56 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] soc: samsung: pmu: modularize the Exynos ARMv8 PMU driver Will McVicker
2021-09-29 13:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-09-28 23:56 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] soc: samsung: pm_domains: modularize EXYNOS_PM_DOMAINS Will McVicker
2021-09-29 13:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-09-28 23:56 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] ARM: rtc: remove HAVE_S3C_RTC in favor of direct dependencies Will McVicker
2021-09-29 11:52 ` Alexandre Belloni
2021-09-29 13:02 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] arm64: Kconfig: Update ARCH_EXYNOS select configs Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-09-29 19:48 ` Will McVicker
2021-09-30 6:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-09-30 9:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-09-30 9:30 ` Lee Jones
2021-09-30 10:33 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-09-30 12:34 ` Lee Jones
2021-09-30 12:38 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-09-30 10:05 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-09-30 9:23 ` Lee Jones
2021-09-30 10:17 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-09-30 10:56 ` Lee Jones
2021-09-30 11:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-09-30 12:08 ` Lee Jones
2021-09-30 16:09 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-09-30 10:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-09-30 12:32 ` Lee Jones
2021-09-30 11:01 ` Tomasz Figa
2021-09-30 11:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-09-30 11:51 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2021-09-30 12:10 ` Tomasz Figa
2021-09-30 12:15 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-09-30 12:45 ` Lee Jones
2021-10-01 4:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-01 4:52 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-10-01 4:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-09-30 12:21 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-09-30 12:39 ` Lee Jones
2021-09-30 13:08 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-09-30 13:29 ` Lee Jones
2021-09-30 16:12 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-09-30 16:21 ` Lee Jones
2021-09-30 16:26 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-09-30 18:02 ` Will McVicker
2021-10-01 4:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-01 4:52 ` Olof Johansson
2021-10-01 5:23 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-10-01 5:35 ` Olof Johansson
2021-10-01 5:59 ` Will McVicker
2021-10-01 8:01 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-10-01 6:02 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-10-01 6:27 ` Olof Johansson
2021-10-01 6:30 ` Olof Johansson
2021-10-01 12:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-10-01 12:31 ` Lee Jones
2021-10-01 15:43 ` Olof Johansson
2021-10-01 11:38 ` Linus Walleij
2021-10-01 11:59 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-10-01 15:59 ` Olof Johansson
2021-10-01 16:51 ` Will McVicker
2021-10-01 17:15 ` Olof Johansson
2021-10-01 17:48 ` Will McVicker
2021-10-01 8:19 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-10-01 9:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-10-01 15:27 ` Olof Johansson
2021-10-01 19:26 ` Saravana Kannan
2021-10-02 1:47 ` Tomasz Figa
2021-10-02 21:03 ` Olof Johansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YVWkxnc8wTdBgRsv@google.com \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willmcvicker@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).