From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786BEC4320A for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 07:36:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A9BE60720 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 07:36:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238555AbhHEHhE (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 03:37:04 -0400 Received: from smtp-relay-canonical-0.canonical.com ([185.125.188.120]:44088 "EHLO smtp-relay-canonical-0.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238203AbhHEHhD (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 03:37:03 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-f70.google.com (mail-ej1-f70.google.com [209.85.218.70]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-canonical-0.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F14103F0A2 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 07:36:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical.com; s=20210705; t=1628149008; bh=FkL9np5HE5mawBpGWfUQVMs1Jp3nZ1r2uXir2/3ncE4=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=YpZ7RHzaXH8CS+hxU9zgucBGnVzaZGZLBfRYZX+P6q8eOlhckpasd841kxVrbeXzK s4kDYQ4x7xu8I+CtWxY76Vnaeah8D4FKksvyboWFOXNV5NZMLhOhdch/xHqKJKekLY pZ/AXITDx3VU3+Xayltk7DkYYSuveiuQAUTaNXtSJBU/OZ/OYJUTxVEGxjY171r8LL 6fBoc1k/yprRfj7nvsUKqRe4GdDFEoDI9j+zjE1C80ZmvzvnfS9/f22mon0T0lvN4n hvJqgxdHIGBo7YZZ1FOG4iQIogRO5/9xY1d5MVZFqEOm/GllEf0nppI1wjJh5huG0N pMmopwBKgqUFA== Received: by mail-ej1-f70.google.com with SMTP id p25-20020a170906b219b02905a698022dbaso1502521ejz.9 for ; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:36:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FkL9np5HE5mawBpGWfUQVMs1Jp3nZ1r2uXir2/3ncE4=; b=Ov7044ta36Pay5ftElwFzQta4q8NKia//2gPC7ACHNkFZamHtPNvunX29qpYOsnJJ+ NtrvPjaVVSv97YLvKRtAVuwBd4E9/9PqVo4L9eK6PYIapo3s2oSARSnRvaaEFZqslulg QrRXAPJzxvJ3+A18kxsghLcQ4DGvOUbm7PS8pMOuaz29Jv3O41YSnAsWvPyqXC81umKh /ZoeldVxfl/ShTp0jTNGknIetIvDPtfJ/L4SevfKW5XOOeqgK6VjHg1GcKSskq7TbjwY T+i0JBrimyx+D57HvjegQafO1P8Zqi4RcoURZGCllGd5/mkTCBVn4RigFrGOA+JsKSd4 xdSQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533G9eS2+1JI5KorDMvsfiAdixfgkuydMDMvxgiugyS3oohpZptz WYmA55FQW4lED6lGXPAZeXsb4F/ctdBEqPqv61vxkMPpTzd8UhmJHHelDYUXqgA9KAnbnpuu1Qy aa/4EfwSH+xVnrHbjI3i6oFWixd+hsbJ1wZoL2K2aQvALJEl3 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c68e:: with SMTP id n14mr4845832edq.66.1628149008741; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:36:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzNcrJVCuj4cNRpvfe7GyxnsvAMJjkp36MUOe1r9B6do8nVXIxKRiZrUJlh02P0wyiqgg+kpw== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c68e:: with SMTP id n14mr4845805edq.66.1628149008579; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:36:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.8.102] ([86.32.42.198]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u4sm1403189eje.81.2021.08.05.00.36.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:36:48 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: exynos: correct GIC CPU interfaces address range on Exynos7 To: Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Alim Akhtar , Chanwoo Choi , Pankaj Dubey , Sam Protsenko , Marc Zyngier References: <20210805072110.4730-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Message-ID: Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 09:36:47 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210805072110.4730-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org On 05/08/2021 09:21, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > The GIC-400 CPU interfaces address range is defined as 0x2000-0x3FFF (by > ARM). > I underestimated the issue - this is actually bug as there is a GICC_DIR register at offset 0x1000. Therefore: Fixes: b9024cbc937d ("arm64: dts: Add initial device tree support for exynos7") > Reported-by: Sam Protsenko > Reported-by: Marc Zyngier > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi > index 8b06397ba6e7..c73a597ca66e 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi > @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ gic: interrupt-controller@11001000 { > #address-cells = <0>; > interrupt-controller; > reg = <0x11001000 0x1000>, > - <0x11002000 0x1000>, > + <0x11002000 0x2000>, > <0x11004000 0x2000>, > <0x11006000 0x2000>; > }; > Best regards, Krzysztof