linux-samsung-soc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
To: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Ryu Euiyoul <ryu.real@samsung.com>,
	Tom Gall <tom.gall@linaro.org>,
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@linaro.org>,
	devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-clk <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Samsung SOC <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] arm64: dts: exynos: Add Exynos850 SoC support
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 09:17:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e264f96e-a230-456b-08a5-dbe3a31bdb43@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPLW+4nY=hozOR+B_0sPZODrk9PXaXg+NB-9pVhDbAjEy7yjhg@mail.gmail.com>

On 04/08/2021 23:30, Sam Protsenko wrote:
>>>
>>> Nice catch! Actually there is an error (typo?) in SoC's TRM, saying
>>> that Virtual Interface Control Register starts at 0x3000 offset (from
>>> 0x12a00000), where it obviously should be 0x4000, that's probably
>>> where this dts error originates from. Btw, I'm also seeing the same
>>> error in exynos7.dtsi.
>>
>> What's the error exactly? The "Virtual interface control register"
>> offset (3rd region) is set properly to 0x4000 on Exynos7. Also one for
>> the Exynos5433 looks correct.
>>
> 
> The issue is that 2nd region's size is 0x1000, but it must be 0x2000.
> It's defined by GIC-400 architecture, as I understand. Please look at
> [1], table 3-1 has very specific offsets and sizes for each functional
> block, and each particular SoC must adhere to that spec. So having
> 0x1000 for 2nd region can't be correct. And because exynos7.dtsi has
> GIC-400 as well, and 0x1000 is specified there for 2nd region size
> too, so I presume there is the same mistake there.

I understand, the range length has indeed same mistake. However it does
not matter that much There are no registers pass 0x10C (so pass 0x1000).
This address space is not used.

> Can you please check the TRM for Exynos7 SoC (if you have one in your
> possession), and see if there is a typo there? E.g. in case of
> Exynos850 TRM I can see that in "Register Map Summary" section the
> offset for the first register (GICH_HCR) in "Virtual Interface Control
> Register" region is specified as 0x3000, where it should be 0x4000, so
> it's probably a typo. But the register description is correct, saying
> that: "Address = Base Address + 0x4000".

The starting addresses of each registers range is different issue and
this one matters. Except same typo as you say, all looks good - they
start at 0x4000.

> 
> [1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0471/b/programmers-model/gic-400-register-map

> 
>>> Though I don't have a TRM for Exynos7 SoCs, so
>>> not sure if I should go ahead and fix that too. Anyway, for Exynos850,
>>> I'll fix that in v2 series.
>>
>>
>> However while we are at addresses - why are you using address-cells 2?
>> It adds everywhere additional 0x0 before actual address.
>>
> 
> Right. For "cpus" node I'll change the address-cells to 1 in my v2
> series. I'll keep address-cells=2 for the root node, but I'm going to
> encapsulate some nodes into soc node (as you suggested earlier), where
> I'll make address-cells=1. That's pretty much how it's done in
> exynos7.dtsi and in exynos5433.dtsi, so I guess that's should be fine
> (to get rid of superfluous 0x0 and conform with other Exynos DTs)?

Yes, thanks.


Best regards,
Krzysztof

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-05  7:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-30 14:49 [PATCH 00/12] Add minimal support for Exynos850 SoC Sam Protsenko
2021-07-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 01/12] pinctrl: samsung: Fix pinctrl bank pin count Sam Protsenko
2021-07-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 02/12] pinctrl: samsung: Add Exynos850 SoC specific data Sam Protsenko
2021-07-30 15:22   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-08-02 19:24     ` Sam Protsenko
2021-07-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 03/12] dt-bindings: pinctrl: samsung: Add Exynos850 doc Sam Protsenko
2021-07-30 15:24   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-30 19:31     ` Sam Protsenko
2021-07-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 04/12] tty: serial: samsung: Init USI to keep clocks running Sam Protsenko
2021-07-30 16:31   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-08-02 23:06     ` Sam Protsenko
2021-08-03  7:37       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-08-03 11:41         ` Sam Protsenko
2021-07-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 05/12] tty: serial: samsung: Fix driver data macros style Sam Protsenko
2021-07-30 16:34   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 06/12] tty: serial: samsung: Add Exynos850 SoC data Sam Protsenko
2021-07-30 15:05   ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-07-30 16:05   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-30 23:10     ` Sam Protsenko
2021-07-31  7:12       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 07/12] dt-bindings: serial: samsung: Add Exynos850 doc Sam Protsenko
2021-07-30 16:35   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-30 19:04     ` Sam Protsenko
2021-07-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 08/12] MAINTAINERS: Cover Samsung clock YAML bindings Sam Protsenko
2021-07-30 15:06   ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-07-30 15:25     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-30 17:32       ` Sam Protsenko
2021-07-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 09/12] dt-bindings: clock: Add bindings for Exynos850 clock controller Sam Protsenko
2021-07-30 15:43   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-08-03 11:55     ` Sam Protsenko
2021-07-30 22:28   ` Rob Herring
2021-07-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 10/12] clk: samsung: Add Exynos850 clock driver stub Sam Protsenko
2021-07-30 15:11   ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-07-30 17:24     ` Sam Protsenko
2021-07-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 11/12] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Add IRQ constants for Exynos850 Sam Protsenko
2021-07-31  8:45   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-08-03 12:58     ` Sam Protsenko
2021-07-30 14:49 ` [PATCH 12/12] arm64: dts: exynos: Add Exynos850 SoC support Sam Protsenko
2021-07-30 16:50   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-08-04 14:39     ` Sam Protsenko
2021-08-04 15:01       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-08-04 18:37         ` Sam Protsenko
2021-08-05  7:39           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-08-05 15:30             ` Sam Protsenko
2021-08-05 15:50               ` Marc Zyngier
2021-08-04 18:36       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-08-04 21:30         ` Sam Protsenko
2021-08-05  7:17           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2021-08-05  7:30             ` Marc Zyngier
2021-08-05  7:35               ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-31  9:03   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-08-05 23:06     ` Sam Protsenko
2021-08-06  7:48       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-08-06 12:07         ` Sam Protsenko
2021-08-06 12:32           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-08-06 12:48             ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-08-06 16:57               ` Sam Protsenko
2021-08-06 20:32             ` Paweł Chmiel
2021-09-06 15:16               ` Sam Protsenko
2021-07-30 15:18 ` [PATCH 00/12] Add minimal support for Exynos850 SoC Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-30 17:21   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-30 19:02     ` Sam Protsenko
2021-07-31  7:29       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-31  8:12         ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-08-02 23:27           ` Sam Protsenko
2021-08-03  7:41             ` Krzysztof Kozlowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e264f96e-a230-456b-08a5-dbe3a31bdb43@canonical.com \
    --to=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
    --cc=amit.pundir@linaro.org \
    --cc=ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryu.real@samsung.com \
    --cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=semen.protsenko@linaro.org \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=tom.gall@linaro.org \
    --cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 12/12] arm64: dts: exynos: Add Exynos850 SoC support' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).