linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>, <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <sumit.saxena@broadcom.com>, <chandrakanth.patil@broadcom.com>,
	<linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] add io_uring with IOPOLL support in scsi layer
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 11:51:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0531d781-38ed-0098-d5b8-727a3e143dde@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201015133633.61836-1-kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>

On 15/10/2020 14:36, Kashyap Desai wrote:
> io_uring with IOPOLL is not currently supported in scsi mid layer.
> Outside of that everything else should work and no extra support in the driver is needed.
> Currently io_uring with IOPOLL support is only available in block layer.
> This patch is to extend support of mq_poll in scsi layer. >
> Signed-off-by: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>
> Cc: sumit.saxena@broadcom.com
> Cc: chandrakanth.patil@broadcom.com
> Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
> 
> ---
>   drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c  | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>   include/scsi/scsi_cmnd.h |  1 +
>   include/scsi/scsi_host.h | 11 +++++++++++
>   3 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> index 72b12102f777..5a3c383a2bb3 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> @@ -1766,6 +1766,19 @@ static void scsi_mq_exit_request(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct request *rq,
>   			       cmd->sense_buffer);
>   }
>   
> +
> +static int scsi_mq_poll(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> +{
> +	struct request_queue *q = hctx->queue;
> +	struct scsi_device *sdev = q->queuedata;
> +	struct Scsi_Host *shost = sdev->host;

could we separately set hctx->driver_data = shost or similar for a 
quicker lookup? I don't see hctx->driver_data set for SCSI currently. 
Going through the scsi_device looks strange - I know that it is done in 
scsi_commit_rqs.

> +
> +	if (shost->hostt->mq_poll)

to avoid this check, could we reject if .mq_poll is not set and 
HCTX_TYPE_POLL is?

> +		return shost->hostt->mq_poll(shost, hctx->queue_num);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>   static int scsi_map_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set)
>   {
>   	struct Scsi_Host *shost = container_of(set, struct Scsi_Host, tag_set);
> @@ -1833,6 +1846,7 @@ static const struct blk_mq_ops scsi_mq_ops_no_commit = {
>   	.cleanup_rq	= scsi_cleanup_rq,
>   	.busy		= scsi_mq_lld_busy,
>   	.map_queues	= scsi_map_queues,
> +	.poll		= scsi_mq_poll,
>   };
>   
>   
> @@ -1861,6 +1875,7 @@ static const struct blk_mq_ops scsi_mq_ops = {
>   	.cleanup_rq	= scsi_cleanup_rq,
>   	.busy		= scsi_mq_lld_busy,
>   	.map_queues	= scsi_map_queues,
> +	.poll		= scsi_mq_poll,
>   };
>   
>   struct request_queue *scsi_mq_alloc_queue(struct scsi_device *sdev)
> @@ -1893,6 +1908,7 @@ int scsi_mq_setup_tags(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
>   	else
>   		tag_set->ops = &scsi_mq_ops_no_commit;
>   	tag_set->nr_hw_queues = shost->nr_hw_queues ? : 1;
> +	tag_set->nr_maps = shost->nr_maps ? : 1;
>   	tag_set->queue_depth = shost->can_queue;
>   	tag_set->cmd_size = cmd_size;
>   	tag_set->numa_node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
> diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_cmnd.h b/include/scsi/scsi_cmnd.h
> index e76bac4d14c5..5844374a85b1 100644
> --- a/include/scsi/scsi_cmnd.h
> +++ b/include/scsi/scsi_cmnd.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>   #include <linux/types.h>
>   #include <linux/timer.h>
>   #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
> +#include <scsi/scsi_host.h>

can we maintain alphabetic ordering?

>   #include <scsi/scsi_device.h>
>   #include <scsi/scsi_request.h>
>   
> diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
> index 701f178b20ae..905ee6b00c55 100644
> --- a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
> +++ b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
> @@ -270,6 +270,16 @@ struct scsi_host_template {
>   	 */
>   	int (* map_queues)(struct Scsi_Host *shost);
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * SCSI interface of blk_poll - poll for IO completions.
> +	 * Possible interface only if scsi LLD expose multiple h/w queues.
> +	 *
> +	 * Return values: Number of completed entries found.

/s/values/value/

> +	 *
> +	 * Status: OPTIONAL
> +	 */
> +	int (* mq_poll)(struct Scsi_Host *shost, unsigned int queue_num);
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * Check if scatterlists need to be padded for DMA draining.
>   	 *
> @@ -610,6 +620,7 @@ struct Scsi_Host {
>   	 * the total queue depth is can_queue.
>   	 */
>   	unsigned nr_hw_queues;
> +	unsigned nr_maps; >   	unsigned active_mode:2;
>   	unsigned unchecked_isa_dma:1;
>   
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-13 12:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-15 13:36 [PATCH v1 1/3] add io_uring with IOPOLL support in scsi layer Kashyap Desai
2020-11-13 11:51 ` John Garry [this message]
2020-11-30  7:41   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-12-01  9:49     ` John Garry
2020-11-20  7:16 ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0531d781-38ed-0098-d5b8-727a3e143dde@huawei.com \
    --to=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=chandrakanth.patil@broadcom.com \
    --cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sumit.saxena@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).