From: "Arulprabhu Ponnusamy (arulponn)" <arulponn@cisco.com>
To: "Karan Tilak Kumar (kartilak)" <kartilak@cisco.com>,
"Satish Kharat (satishkh)" <satishkh@cisco.com>
Cc: "Sesidhar Baddela (sebaddel)" <sebaddel@cisco.com>,
"jejb@linux.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: fnic: Validate io_req before others
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 01:32:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0C569CCE-A202-4C01-B112-92080126BA87@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201121023337.19295-1-kartilak@cisco.com>
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Arulprabhu Ponnusamy <arulponn@cisco.com>
On 11/20/20, 6:33 PM, "Karan Tilak Kumar" <kartilak@cisco.com> wrote:
We need to check for a valid io_req before
we check other data. Also, removing
redundant checks.
Signed-off-by: Karan Tilak Kumar <kartilak@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Satish Kharat <satishkh@cisco.com>
---
drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic.h | 2 +-
drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_scsi.c | 9 ++++-----
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic.h b/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic.h
index e4d399f41a0a..69f373b53132 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic.h
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
#define DRV_NAME "fnic"
#define DRV_DESCRIPTION "Cisco FCoE HBA Driver"
-#define DRV_VERSION "1.6.0.52"
+#define DRV_VERSION "1.6.0.53"
#define PFX DRV_NAME ": "
#define DFX DRV_NAME "%d: "
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_scsi.c
index 532c3c7ae372..36744968378f 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_scsi.c
@@ -1735,15 +1735,14 @@ void fnic_terminate_rport_io(struct fc_rport *rport)
continue;
}
- cmd_rport = starget_to_rport(scsi_target(sc->device));
- if (rport != cmd_rport) {
+ io_req = (struct fnic_io_req *)CMD_SP(sc);
+ if (!io_req) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(io_lock, flags);
continue;
}
- io_req = (struct fnic_io_req *)CMD_SP(sc);
-
- if (!io_req || rport != cmd_rport) {
+ cmd_rport = starget_to_rport(scsi_target(sc->device));
+ if (rport != cmd_rport) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(io_lock, flags);
continue;
}
--
2.29.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-24 1:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-21 2:33 [PATCH] scsi: fnic: Validate io_req before others Karan Tilak Kumar
2020-11-24 1:32 ` Arulprabhu Ponnusamy (arulponn) [this message]
2020-11-24 3:48 ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-12-01 5:04 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0C569CCE-A202-4C01-B112-92080126BA87@cisco.com \
--to=arulponn@cisco.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kartilak@cisco.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=satishkh@cisco.com \
--cc=sebaddel@cisco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).