From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: cang@codeaurora.org
Cc: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>,
asutoshd@codeaurora.org, nguyenb@codeaurora.org,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com,
saravanak@google.com, Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@google.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
Pedro Sousa <pedrom.sousa@synopsys.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] scsi: ufs-qcom: Add reset control support for host controller
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 09:42:00 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191218041200.GP2536@vkoul-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <75f7065d08f450c6cbb2b2662658ecaa@codeaurora.org>
On 18-12-19, 02:44, cang@codeaurora.org wrote:
> Hi Vinod and Jeffrey,
>
> Let me summary here, now the 1000000us timeout works for both 845 and 8998.
> However, 8150 still fails.
>
> > > The bigger question is why is the reset causing the timeout to be
> > > increased for sdm845 and not to work in case of sm8150! (Vinod)
>
> I would not say this patch increases the timeout. With this patch,
> the PCS polling timeout, per my profiling, the PCS ready usually needs
> less than 5000us, which is the actual time needed for PCS bit to be ready.
>
> The reason why 1000us worked for you is because, w/o the patch, UFS PHY
> registers are retained from pre-kernel stage (bootloader i.e.), the PCS
> ready
> bit was set to 1 in pre-kernel stage, so when kernel driver reads it, it
> returns
> 1, not even to be polled at all. It may seem "faster", but not the right
> thing to do, because kernel stage may need different PHY settings than
> pre-kernel stage, keeping the settings configured in pre-kernel stage is not
> always right, so this patch is needed. And increasing 1000us to 1000000us
> is the right thing to do, but not a hack.
>
> As reg for the phy initialization timeout on 8150, I found there is
> something
> wrong with its settings in /drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp.c
>
> static const struct qmp_phy_init_tbl sm8150_ufsphy_serdes_tbl[] = {
> QMP_PHY_INIT_CFG(QPHY_POWER_DOWN_CONTROL, 0x01),
> QMP_PHY_INIT_CFG(QSERDES_V4_COM_SYSCLK_EN_SEL, 0xd9),
>
> "QMP_PHY_INIT_CFG(QPHY_POWER_DOWN_CONTROL, 0x01)" should NOT appear in the
> serdes
> table! I haven't check who made this change, but please have a try after
> remove
> this line from sm8150_ufsphy_serdes_tbl.
That is me :) Looks like I made an error while porting from downstream. I
did a quick check to remove this and it doesn't work yet, let me recheck
the settings again ...
Thanks for your help!
--
~Vinod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-18 4:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-15 6:09 [PATCH v5 0/7] UFS driver general fixes bundle 3 Can Guo
2019-11-15 6:09 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] scsi: ufs: Add device reset in link recovery path Can Guo
2019-11-15 6:25 ` Stanley Chu
2019-11-15 6:09 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] scsi: ufs-qcom: Add reset control support for host controller Can Guo
2019-11-15 10:08 ` Avri Altman
2019-12-16 19:04 ` Vinod Koul
2019-12-16 19:12 ` Jeffrey Hugo
2019-12-17 0:37 ` cang
2019-12-17 4:13 ` Vinod Koul
2019-12-17 7:10 ` cang
2019-12-17 9:24 ` Vinod Koul
2019-12-17 10:09 ` cang
2019-12-17 15:08 ` Vinod Koul
2019-12-17 16:00 ` Jeffrey Hugo
2019-12-17 18:44 ` cang
2019-12-18 4:12 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2019-12-19 7:12 ` cang
2019-12-19 14:21 ` Vinod Koul
2019-12-19 14:25 ` Jeffrey Hugo
2019-12-19 14:52 ` Vinod Koul
2019-12-20 0:30 ` cang
2019-11-15 6:09 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] scsi: ufs: Fix up auto hibern8 enablement Can Guo
2019-11-15 6:35 ` Stanley Chu
2019-11-15 7:03 ` Can Guo
2019-11-15 7:18 ` Stanley Chu
2019-11-15 12:27 ` Can Guo
2019-11-15 13:46 ` Stanley Chu
2019-11-15 6:09 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] scsi: ufs: Fix register dump caused sleep in atomic context Can Guo
2019-11-15 6:09 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] scsi: ufs: Fix irq return code Can Guo
2019-11-15 6:09 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] scsi: ufs: Abort gating if clock on request is pending Can Guo
2019-11-15 6:09 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] scsi: ufs: Fix error handing during hibern8 enter Can Guo
2019-11-15 10:12 ` Avri Altman
2019-11-17 16:36 ` [EXT] " Bean Huo (beanhuo)
2019-11-19 4:28 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] UFS driver general fixes bundle 3 Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191218041200.GP2536@vkoul-mobl \
--to=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=nguyenb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=pedrom.sousa@synopsys.com \
--cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=salyzyn@google.com \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).