From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B766BC433EC for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 08:07:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 920FB21582 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 08:07:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="JRGHHhE9" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725883AbgGNIHB (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jul 2020 04:07:01 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:23270 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725793AbgGNIHA (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jul 2020 04:07:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1594714019; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=O2WkUS2baLZHo/qw2l6XXN08NWlFRGUaRro8FxAfMIo=; b=JRGHHhE9Nhcx2kCRE+VvsBPsqKYr6XSH6Dzf2k4TwgMCA+5LP2ojtUlEIUabc1o+jt0B1M zlV65RCiiXzauilXnJclzcOhw811gh9Vq7vxuaudvfNGKqpw1uJFzFYGIW2EUaEdUAp5wS XD2y6y9+opqqa3Ws/VYMDauykAt/jS0= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-276-ve21ehAVP72vb1IRekK_zA-1; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 04:06:55 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ve21ehAVP72vb1IRekK_zA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88193800400; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 08:06:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from T590 (ovpn-13-177.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.13.177]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F92372E59; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 08:06:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 16:06:31 +0800 From: Ming Lei To: John Garry Cc: Hannes Reinecke , don.brace@microsemi.com, axboe@kernel.dk, jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, kashyap.desai@broadcom.com, sumit.saxena@broadcom.com, bvanassche@acm.org, hare@suse.com, hch@lst.de, shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, esc.storagedev@microsemi.com, chenxiang66@hisilicon.com, megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v7 12/12] hpsa: enable host_tagset and switch to MQ Message-ID: <20200714080631.GA600766@T590> References: <1591810159-240929-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <1591810159-240929-13-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <939891db-a584-1ff7-d6a0-3857e4257d3e@huawei.com> <3b3ead84-5d2f-dcf2-33d5-6aa12d5d9f7e@suse.de> <4319615a-220b-3629-3bf4-1e7fd2d27b92@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4319615a-220b-3629-3bf4-1e7fd2d27b92@huawei.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 08:52:36AM +0100, John Garry wrote: > On 14/07/2020 08:41, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > > On 7/14/20 9:37 AM, John Garry wrote: > > > On 10/06/2020 18:29, John Garry wrote: > > > > From: Hannes Reinecke > > > > > > > > The smart array HBAs can steer interrupt completion, so this > > > > patch switches the implementation to use multiqueue and enables > > > > 'host_tagset' as the HBA has a shared host-wide tagset. > > > > > > > > > > Hi Don, > > > > > > I am preparing the next iteration of this series, and we're getting > > > close to dropping the RFC tags. The series has grown a bit, and I am not > > > sure what to do with hpsa support. > > > > > > The latest versions of this series have not been tested for hpsa, AFAIK. > > > Can you let me know if you can test and review this patch? Or someone > > > else let me know it's tested (Hannes?) > > > I'll give it a go. > > > > Which git repository should I base the tests on? > > v7 is here: > > https://github.com/hisilicon/kernel-dev/commits/private-topic-blk-mq-shared-tags-rfc-v7 > > So that should be good to test with for now. > > And I was going to ask this same question about smartpqi, so can you please > let me know about this one? smartpqi is real MQ HBA, do you need any change wrt. shared tags? Thanks, Ming