From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> To: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Cc: "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Subject: [PATCH v5 0/8] Rework runtime suspend and SPI domain validation Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 21:29:43 -0800 Message-ID: <20201209052951.16136-1-bvanassche@acm.org> (raw) Hi Martin, The SCSI runtime suspend and SPI domain validation mechanisms both use scsi_device_quiesce(). scsi_device_quiesce() restricts blk_queue_enter() to BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT requests. There is a conflict between the requirements of runtime suspend and SCSI domain validation: no requests must be sent to runtime suspended devices that are in the state RPM_SUSPENDED while BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT requests must be processed during SCSI domain validation. This conflict is resolved by reworking the SCSI domain validation implementation. Hybernation, runtime suspend and SCSI domain validation have been retested. Please consider this patch series for kernel v5.11. Thanks, Bart. Changes between v4 and v5: - Fixed the CONFIG_PM=n build. - Left out patch "scsi: Do not wait for a request in scsi_eh_lock_door()". Changes between v3 and v4: - Instead of creating a second request queue for SPI DV, set RQF_PM. Changes between v2 and v3: - Inlined scsi_mq_alloc_queue() into scsi_alloc_sdev() as requested by Christoph. Changes between v1 and v2: - Rebased this patch series on top of kernel v5.10-rc1. Alan Stern (1): block: Do not accept any requests while suspended Bart Van Assche (7): block: Fix a race in the runtime power management code block: Introduce BLK_MQ_REQ_PM ide: Do not set the RQF_PREEMPT flag for sense requests ide: Mark power management requests with RQF_PM instead of RQF_PREEMPT scsi_transport_spi: Set RQF_PM for domain validation commands scsi: Only process PM requests if rpm_status != RPM_ACTIVE block: Remove RQF_PREEMPT and BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT block/blk-core.c | 13 +++++++------ block/blk-mq-debugfs.c | 1 - block/blk-mq.c | 4 ++-- block/blk-pm.c | 15 +++++++++------ block/blk-pm.h | 14 +++++++++----- drivers/ide/ide-atapi.c | 1 - drivers/ide/ide-io.c | 7 +------ drivers/ide/ide-pm.c | 2 +- drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 27 ++++++++++++++------------- drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_spi.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++-------- include/linux/blk-mq.h | 4 ++-- include/linux/blkdev.h | 18 +++++++++++++----- 12 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
next reply index Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-12-09 5:29 Bart Van Assche [this message] 2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] block: Fix a race in the runtime power management code Bart Van Assche 2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] block: Introduce BLK_MQ_REQ_PM Bart Van Assche 2020-12-09 6:06 ` Can Guo 2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] ide: Do not set the RQF_PREEMPT flag for sense requests Bart Van Assche 2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] ide: Mark power management requests with RQF_PM instead of RQF_PREEMPT Bart Van Assche 2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] scsi_transport_spi: Set RQF_PM for domain validation commands Bart Van Assche 2020-12-09 7:34 ` Hannes Reinecke 2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] scsi: Only process PM requests if rpm_status != RPM_ACTIVE Bart Van Assche 2020-12-09 6:06 ` Can Guo 2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] block: Remove RQF_PREEMPT and BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT Bart Van Assche 2020-12-09 6:05 ` Can Guo 2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] block: Do not accept any requests while suspended Bart Van Assche 2020-12-09 6:04 ` Can Guo 2020-12-09 7:36 ` Hannes Reinecke 2020-12-09 16:44 ` [PATCH v5 0/8] Rework runtime suspend and SPI domain validation Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20201209052951.16136-1-bvanassche@acm.org \ --to=bvanassche@acm.org \ --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \ --cc=hare@suse.de \ --cc=hch@lst.de \ --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \ --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Linux-SCSI Archive on lore.kernel.org Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/0 linux-scsi/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 linux-scsi linux-scsi/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi \ linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org public-inbox-index linux-scsi Example config snippet for mirrors Newsgroup available over NNTP: nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-scsi AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git