linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ahmed S . Darwish" <a.darwish@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] scsi: target: Remove in_interrupt() usage.
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 17:51:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210122165133.3ejgs4d5tewnuvps@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201220203638.43615-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>

On 2020-12-20 21:36:32 [+0100], To target-devel@vger.kernel.org wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> in the discussion about preempt count consistency across kernel
> configurations:
> 
>  https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200914204209.256266093@linutronix.de/
> 
> it was concluded that the usage of in_interrupt() and related context
> checks should be removed from non-core code.
> 
> In the long run, usage of 'preemptible, in_*irq etc.' should be banned from
> driver code completely.
> 
> This series addresses the target subsystem.
> Most of in_interrupt() usage is debugging. There is one function which
> either invokes wait_for_completion() or schedules a timer based on
> in_interrupt().

A gentle ping case it got buried somewhere in the merge window / xmas.
My understanding is that nab is out-of-town and target gets routed via
scsi.

Sebastian

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-22 17:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-20 20:36 [PATCH 0/6] scsi: target: Remove in_interrupt() usage Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-12-20 20:36 ` [PATCH 1/6] scsi: target: iscsi: Avoid in_interrupt() usage in iscsit_close_session() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-12-20 20:36 ` [PATCH 2/6] scsi: target: iscsi: Avoid in_interrupt() usage in iscsit_check_session_usage_count() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-12-20 20:36 ` [PATCH 3/6] scsi: target: iscsi: Redo iscsit_check_session_usage_count() return code Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-12-20 20:36 ` [PATCH 4/6] scsi: target: Remove in_interrupt() usage in core_alua_check_nonop_delay() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-12-20 20:36 ` [PATCH 5/6] scsi: target: Replace in_interrupt() usage in target_submit_cmd_map_sgls() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-12-20 20:36 ` [PATCH 6/6] scsi: target: Remove in_interrupt() check in transport_handle_cdb_direct() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-01-22 16:51 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2021-01-23  1:28   ` [PATCH 0/6] scsi: target: Remove in_interrupt() usage Martin K. Petersen
2021-01-27  4:54 ` Martin K. Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210122165133.3ejgs4d5tewnuvps@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=a.darwish@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).