linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: martin.petersen@oracle.com, Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] SCSI and block: Simplify resume handling
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 20:29:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <269bdaab-797e-f54c-11af-46561220b448@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200706151436.GA702867@rowland.harvard.edu>

On 2020-07-06 08:14, Alan Stern wrote:
> Commit 05d18ae1cc8a ("scsi: pm: Balance pm_only counter of request
> queue during system resume") fixed a problem in the block layer's
> runtime-PM code: blk_set_runtime_active() failed to call
> blk_clear_pm_only().  However, the commit's implementation was
> awkward; it forced the SCSI system-resume handler to choose whether to
> call blk_post_runtime_resume() or blk_set_runtime_active(), depending
> on whether or not the SCSI device had previously been runtime
> suspended.
> 
> This patch simplifies the situation considerably by adding the missing
> function call directly into blk_set_runtime_active() (under the
> condition that the queue is not already in the RPM_ACTIVE state).
> This allows the SCSI routine to revert back to its original form.
> Furthermore, making this change reveals that blk_post_runtime_resume()
> (in its success pathway) does exactly the same thing as
> blk_set_runtime_active().  The duplicate code is easily removed by
> making one routine call the other.
> 
> No functional changes are intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
> CC: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
> CC: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>

This patch looks good to me. Can, since this patch modifies code in
which you recently fixed a bug, would it be possible to test this patch?

Thanks,

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-09  3:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-01 18:37 [PATCH v2] SCSI and block: Simplify resume handling Alan Stern
2020-07-06  2:41 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-07-06 15:14   ` [PATCH v3] " Alan Stern
2020-07-09  3:29     ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2020-07-21  3:01       ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-07-23  3:53     ` Bart Van Assche
2020-07-25  2:50     ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-07-22  1:46 ` [PATCH v2] " Can Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=269bdaab-797e-f54c-11af-46561220b448@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).