From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62069C433EF for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2021 23:56:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242554AbhLBX7m (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Dec 2021 18:59:42 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-f180.google.com ([209.85.215.180]:38542 "EHLO mail-pg1-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235895AbhLBX7m (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Dec 2021 18:59:42 -0500 Received: by mail-pg1-f180.google.com with SMTP id s137so1314965pgs.5 for ; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 15:56:19 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:from:to:cc:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XYr5qnrTJq7UFpm7ZkFEeXoXgXb87ZAhxCaIWjzsKpY=; b=73ima+iYWkqyujIkhCWdlCiyUfqNGqrcPkEp7nllZyPDHGSSplieM3pKLlThkWcAYw 14eOeS/n2CmcMCQ/x3mwbaDPgh0OpzVWc6O9vttraGi+4RdYUsD3+6L8zoOqnWQJW5Yr wpEjDWcHuOBSfrV3/g8UbxF0t6McnPIAYEMLNk6DRuqtj8PVohT5H+pWfu+BEsG3VstL z8+a7mCJvvbjmlpdyXCfN4/4r+K2SAgJMeUGqdBHy3LpEB2WQA8ZCwKTZO6bfv3oU9oq 4RdDXl3cgn0OA6QvQQEEo/EMyJ2y33x4ukXmNF8hat0pGx3tcp8vhuY56C4Jm2Ph4mw2 9IUg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532uqkrGq0QbvZDUUcfzbbHp/qHmuNcRHBUyoRAT3+ZmUW23UYkV CJHQLkrsb1c8ZJImGDS4WKY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwLt6LBxSI88Piu3iGgAD6+PI2El8+pyCwoZNMaV1Lto/qaJlV2kuFlfeXk6jWgItyxqYLg5g== X-Received: by 2002:a62:80d2:0:b0:4a4:b4e3:a723 with SMTP id j201-20020a6280d2000000b004a4b4e3a723mr15685166pfd.8.1638489378964; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 15:56:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from bvanassche-linux.mtv.corp.google.com ([2620:15c:211:201:fac5:b2eb:ef0d:f30b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t66sm840463pfd.150.2021.12.02.15.56.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Dec 2021 15:56:18 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/17] scsi: ufs: Optimize the command queueing code From: Bart Van Assche To: "Asutosh Das (asd)" , "Martin K . Petersen" Cc: Jaegeuk Kim , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "James E.J. Bottomley" , Bean Huo , Avri Altman , Can Guo , Adrian Hunter , Stanley Chu , Keoseong Park References: <20211130233324.1402448-1-bvanassche@acm.org> <20211130233324.1402448-17-bvanassche@acm.org> <1be2859c-c698-7bfd-2ed1-ea17bbeedad7@codeaurora.org> <1be02f4a-2ab6-63fd-f6f2-3825c28ef4e5@acm.org> Message-ID: <2a7e32ce-b3b8-d833-61f1-cd9864c551bc@acm.org> Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 15:56:17 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1be02f4a-2ab6-63fd-f6f2-3825c28ef4e5@acm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 12/2/21 10:13 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > +static u32 ufshcd_pending_cmds(struct ufs_hba *hba) > +{ > +    struct scsi_device *sdev; > +    u32 pending; ^^^^^^^^^^^ (replying to my own email) The above should be changed into "u32 pending = 0;" Thanks, Bart.