From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 35/35] Add Xen virtual block device driver. Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 08:37:15 -0500 Message-ID: <4423F60B.6020805@garzik.org> References: <4421D943.1090804@garzik.org> <1143202673.18986.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4423E853.1040707@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4423E853.1040707@garzik.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox Cc: Ian Pratt , Anthony Liguori , Chris Wright , virtualization@lists.osdl.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ian Pratt , ian.pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk, SCSI Mailing List List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik wrote: > In fact, SCSI should make a few things easier, because the notion of > host+bus topology is already present, and notion of messaging is already > present, so you don't have to recreate that in a Xen block device > infrastructure. Another benefit of SCSI: when an IBM hypervisor in the Linux kernel switched to SCSI, that allowed them to replace several drivers (virt disk, virt cdrom, virt floppy?) with a single virt-SCSI driver. Jeff