From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>, "linux-scsi @ vger . kernel . org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>, "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Problem with scsi device sysfs attributes Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 12:31:58 +0900 [thread overview] Message-ID: <4b3e8a72-0b48-95e3-6617-a685d42c08fb@opensource.wdc.com> (raw) Bart, Your patch 92c4b58b15c5 ("scsi: core: Register sysfs attributes earlier") modified the scsi device sysfs attributes initialization to use the scsi template shost_groups and sdev_groups for adding attributes using groups instead of arrays of attrs. However, this patch completely removed the sysfs_create_groups() call to actually create the attributes listed in the groups. As a result, I see many missing sysfs device attributes for at least ahci (e.g. ncq_prio_enavle, ncq_prio_supported), but I suspect other device types may have similar problems. I do not see where the attribute groups in the arrray sdev->gendev_attr_groups are registered with sysfs. In fact, it looks like sdev->gendev_attr_groups is referenced only in scsi_sysfs.c but only for initializing it. It is never used to actually register the attr groups... Am I missing something ? This is at least breaking NCQ priority support right now. Did your patch 92c4b58b15c5 remove too much code ? Shouldn't we have a call to sysfs_create_groups() somewhere ? I think that should be in scsi_sysfs_device_initialize() but I am not 100% sure. -- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research
next reply other threads:[~2021-11-11 3:32 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-11-11 3:31 Damien Le Moal [this message] 2021-11-11 5:27 ` Damien Le Moal 2021-11-11 8:46 ` Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=4b3e8a72-0b48-95e3-6617-a685d42c08fb@opensource.wdc.com \ --to=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \ --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \ --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \ --subject='Re: Problem with scsi device sysfs attributes' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).