From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFBDC433E0 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 11:33:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8000204EC for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 11:33:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728897AbgGHLdK (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2020 07:33:10 -0400 Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com ([185.176.76.210]:2440 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728742AbgGHLdK (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2020 07:33:10 -0400 Received: from lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id E091CFBE4E751B066A8A; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 12:33:08 +0100 (IST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.210.171.111) by lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 12:33:07 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v7 10/12] megaraid_sas: switch fusion adapters to MQ To: Kashyap Desai , , , , , Sumit Saxena , , , , , Shivasharan Srikanteshwara CC: , , , , "PDL,MEGARAIDLINUX" References: <1591810159-240929-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <1591810159-240929-11-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <92ba1829c9e822e4239a7cdfd94acbce@mail.gmail.com> From: John Garry Message-ID: <5cac073f-d930-3074-49a8-515dcd0d80d6@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 12:31:27 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <92ba1829c9e822e4239a7cdfd94acbce@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.210.171.111] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml709-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.58) To lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 06/07/2020 20:19, Kashyap Desai wrote: >>> My understanding is >>> - This RFC + patch set from above link is required for it. I could not >>> see above series is committed. >> It is committed and part of 5.8-rc1 >> >> The latest rc should have some scheduler fixes also. >> >> I also note that there has been much churn on blk-mq tag code lately, and >> something may be broken, so I plan to verify latest rc myself soon. > Thanks. I will try merging 5.8-rc1 and RFC and see how CPU hot plug works. > JFYI, I tested 5.8-rc4 for scheduler=none and =mq-deadline (no fully tested), and it looks ok john