From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78206C433F5 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 22:26:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233584AbhLIWab (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Dec 2021 17:30:31 -0500 Received: from esa6.hgst.iphmx.com ([216.71.154.45]:27926 "EHLO esa6.hgst.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232449AbhLIWaa (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Dec 2021 17:30:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=wdc.com; i=@wdc.com; q=dns/txt; s=dkim.wdc.com; t=1639088817; x=1670624817; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=975X2tBKbiQALZA1i/B97FNGR1LMtD4rh57iUWiO0Zw=; b=oq4/J47m07dejqhwpEPHjSKYdE3z9bmfEuRFBuxVGdKrNifceMuzvZ+k fSYb6laxVl6MA5ICG6jDyRtbzuhj71oF8cnJ04xzrnq78EGLdGOnXXvkb rNpu25bANfwfQj04hRMzYMofnG4DAETKnO78i1nrikTE32I2fqqAL+vmJ V2r8n6eBLxYid8s/XsSQi/qWdtx2cDN62GjNS2R+0sNLnPBLyWyNveb1c DaJBPS6OwHZa4fVrS5aQ8LTMq/p7W6tLf32yXDoWNfoDPPFHA9RoteWjs ODK5MqzSiWApQ3aXUmD0jHFsghPNJ9VLqAeZIV3ngmcBtLMNqPG1co98c g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,193,1635177600"; d="scan'208";a="188892982" Received: from h199-255-45-14.hgst.com (HELO uls-op-cesaep01.wdc.com) ([199.255.45.14]) by ob1.hgst.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 10 Dec 2021 06:26:57 +0800 IronPort-SDR: jeMMF7mZ1h1Sls0P+iKju8CQmZaBtUWRKPMvCqAf35YS2MUmCjnUd3M9jX9ZNh2CcZ7coFgOTX O9FPbIPORAdvQNk0w8fo0yMUAn/XeHF2X8vU25eYWRTUlvZThxC+aqgUWyB9/fi8oCzXvpSYbA ZWdi3MRQmfXHLWH6JAESakRFxu9mTjxIZBVOOzC/C8oFoDpuepAvVg0VGFYeNG6GuiPwXU28DJ FWJ+jQHLjuRjLewOZ17sf1dPdYeyENm+ios5Ox7o35+IPGjCGmqqRbaoW6Y6+Umu5Md/WzNHd/ pcygyYusLgtHbuWq0+w701xZ Received: from uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com ([10.248.3.37]) by uls-op-cesaep01.wdc.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Dec 2021 14:01:29 -0800 IronPort-SDR: Y33ZD/vWQj/gXvZ8Xrjg0miOxO0wVUhjd4SybXFOWaeq2DuwiD1VbhcJUbJfo4DhuGvbO6S8EJ s39MxoC1g3en0y7OwwLQR7Cdiew2fJYaD5AHihhZUARazEwJOTL1uRGk8KrD86pJNpwEjrx+31 C8wS+qUaY7cKmcpztOdeR2ZHT3JmRDIQOwkAiuGViOuJDPo/4YBDiul0ZbIGLLt1za3+Iq9L+M 0Cf9LLwt+JjOAZvJX1gS3uEh3EA5ntMHdWgb5c8Uo/T/EcCjYVjhfYkViwYCCqMK0f6R3y8pi1 K9Y= WDCIronportException: Internal Received: from usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com ([10.3.10.180]) by uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Dec 2021 14:26:57 -0800 Received: from usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com (usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com [127.0.0.1]) by usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4J97tm4Vd2z1Rwns for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 14:26:56 -0800 (PST) Authentication-Results: usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=opensource.wdc.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d= opensource.wdc.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :in-reply-to:organization:from:references:to:content-language :subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id; s=dkim; t= 1639088815; x=1641680816; bh=975X2tBKbiQALZA1i/B97FNGR1LMtD4rh57 iUWiO0Zw=; b=LWg8HmILYtwcIy67QMnmFtLckzM5vDZQxuW/0WrAY66BlZTJDSU oI5p/edn4uz21hPgYEi325chLddcQTgcaf+tkYps4rpWWTH7tmLorT2zhxkvBLDU ibFH68uGrJn374cUokUtPUSCgthUvUW9GkNN4QFnIKT5Wls3MqiVhZtalCFhK9HG /DEUJo6woooqeVAUUJSHORsbPegkfgl2ZO9ZRxRH3KeG5eUIxKPKEfCn3RkION/O 9SQ2pRLuABnDHZbjtCTuo4Vn1qBXronI4QY8oIeMn4fM5Q5l+nmfiVDiTdMwjBFa UtHJEdEcmfj9Qz8l5ryqht5Y8mXW+i92y5Q== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com Received: from usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com ([127.0.0.1]) by usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com (usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 4TmE95pCrDeu for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 14:26:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.225.54.48] (unknown [10.225.54.48]) by usg-ed-osssrv.wdc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4J97tk19ZWz1RtVG; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 14:26:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <666af6d2-ac0b-9b47-a396-a5028772cf0a@opensource.wdc.com> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 07:26:52 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: pm8001: Fix phys_to_virt() usage on dma_addr_t Content-Language: en-US To: Ajish.Koshy@microchip.com, john.garry@huawei.com Cc: jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, Viswas.G@microchip.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Niklas.Cassel@wdc.com, Vasanthalakshmi.Tharmarajan@microchip.com References: <1637940933-107862-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> <6ee6fe1b-e811-cada-0c18-78149c313358@huawei.com> From: Damien Le Moal Organization: Western Digital In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 2021/12/09 21:04, Ajish.Koshy@microchip.com wrote: > Hi John, > > Was testing the patch on arm server. Didn't see crash there but observing > timeouts and error handling getting triggered for drives. But the same code > works fine on x86. > > At your end do you still face similar situation on arm server ? > > Thanks, Ajish Please do not top post. It makes it hard to follow the conversation. Are the drives you are using SATA or SAS ? Could you post the output of dmesg related to the errors you are seeing ? > > -----Original Message----- From: John Garry Sent: > Tuesday, December 7, 2021 07:24 PM To: Ajish Koshy - I30923 > Cc: jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com; > jejb@linux.ibm.com; martin.petersen@oracle.com; Viswas G - I30667 > ; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com; > Niklas.Cassel@wdc.com; Vasanthalakshmi Tharmarajan - I30664 > Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: > pm8001: Fix phys_to_virt() usage on dma_addr_t > > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the > content is safe > > On 07/12/2021 10:36, Ajish.Koshy@microchip.com wrote: >> Well I could see this kernel panic [ 126.843958] RIP: >> 0010:pm80xx_chip_smp_req+0x1d6/0x2e0 [pm80xx] with respect to existing >> driver on my current system x86 64bit after enabling the following 2 kernel >> boot arguments: -intel_iommu=on -iommu.passthrough=0 >> > OK, so it seems that it was the kernel which was just not enabling the IOMMU > previously, which would be consistent with what Niklas mentioned. > > Anyway, please supply reviewed-by and/or tested-by tags so that the SCSI > maintainers can pick it up. > > I suppose that we should also have: > > Fixes: f5860992db55 ("[SCSI] pm80xx: Added SPCv/ve specific hardware > functionalities and relevant changes in common files") > > Thanks for testing, John -- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research