From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975ADC432C2 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:01:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7663321D56 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:01:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725883AbfIZLBC (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Sep 2019 07:01:02 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:47342 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725280AbfIZLBB (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Sep 2019 07:01:01 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x8QAweOj159689 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 07:01:00 -0400 Received: from e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.98]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2v8ud0250e-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 07:00:59 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 12:00:58 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 26 Sep 2019 12:00:56 +0100 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x8QB0sUN19529884 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:00:54 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C666A4059; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:00:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA52A4053; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:00:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc4120165700.ibm.com (unknown [9.152.96.183]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:00:54 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] zfcp: fix reaction on bit error theshold notification with adapter close To: Sasha Levin , "James E . J . Bottomley" Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Benjamin Block References: <20190924160616.15301-1-maier@linux.ibm.com> <20190925224305.00183208C3@mail.kernel.org> From: Steffen Maier Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 13:00:53 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190925224305.00183208C3@mail.kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19092611-0008-0000-0000-0000031B4CA5 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19092611-0009-0000-0000-00004A39E7AD Message-Id: <77d90d91-68a3-187e-7d5a-114f02a05dea@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-09-26_05:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1909260104 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 9/26/19 12:43 AM, Sasha Levin wrote: > [This is an automated email] > > This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag, > fixing commit: 1da177e4c3f4 Linux-2.6.12-rc2. > > The bot has tested the following trees: v5.3.1, v5.2.17, v4.19.75, v4.14.146, v4.9.194, v4.4.194. > > v5.3.1: Build OK! > v5.2.17: Build OK! > v4.19.75: Build OK! > v4.14.146: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: > 75492a51568b ("s390/scsi: Convert timers to use timer_setup()") > > v4.9.194: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: > 75492a51568b ("s390/scsi: Convert timers to use timer_setup()") > bc46427e807e ("scsi: zfcp: use setup_timer instead of init_timer") > > v4.4.194: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: > 75492a51568b ("s390/scsi: Convert timers to use timer_setup()") > bc46427e807e ("scsi: zfcp: use setup_timer instead of init_timer") > > > NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream. > > How should we proceed with this patch? It's sufficient to have the fix in those more recent stable trees where it applies (and builds). My fixes tag formally indicates since when it was at least broken but I don't expect all stable or longterm kernels to get the fix. If I happen to find out we need the fix in a kernel where it does not apply, I'll send a backport to stable when the time is right. Showing the possible dependencies is awesome! -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Kind regards Steffen Maier Linux on IBM Z Development https://www.ibm.com/privacy/us/en/ IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Matthias Hartmann Geschaeftsfuehrung: Dirk Wittkopp Sitz der Gesellschaft: Boeblingen Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294