From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Ewan D . Milne" <emilne@redhat.com>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>,
lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [scsi] 74eb6c22dc: suspend_stress.fail
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 19:52:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <824c5a0b-a31a-b0a2-b14a-ab6edd294d07@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191104085021.GF13369@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
On 2019-11-04 00:50, kernel test robot wrote:
> FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-7):
>
> commit: 74eb6c22dc70e395b333c9ca579855cd88db8845 ("[RFC PATCH V3 2/2] scsi: core: don't limit per-LUN queue depth for SSD")
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Ming-Lei/scsi-core-avoid-host-wide-host_busy-counter-for-scsi_mq/20191009-015827
> base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi.git for-next
>
> in testcase: suspend_stress
> with following parameters:
>
> mode: freeze
> iterations: 10
Hi Ming,
This is the second report by the build robot that this patch causes the
suspend_stress test to fail. I assume that that means that that test
failure is not a coincidence. The previous report (Oct-22) is available
at https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20191023003027.GD12647@shao2-debian/.
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-05 3:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-08 10:09 [PATCH V3 0/2] scsi: avoid atomic operations in IO path Ming Lei
2019-10-08 10:09 ` [PATCH V3 1/2] scsi: core: avoid host-wide host_busy counter for scsi_mq Ming Lei
2019-10-08 10:09 ` [RFC PATCH V3 2/2] scsi: core: don't limit per-LUN queue depth for SSD Ming Lei
2019-11-04 8:50 ` [scsi] 74eb6c22dc: suspend_stress.fail kernel test robot
2019-11-05 3:52 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2019-11-05 6:11 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-13 17:00 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-11-14 1:25 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-16 8:54 ` Ming Lei
2019-11-21 6:50 ` Oliver Sang
2019-11-21 7:36 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=824c5a0b-a31a-b0a2-b14a-ab6edd294d07@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
--cc=loberman@redhat.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).