linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wenchao Hao <haowenchao@huawei.com>
To: Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>,
	Lee Duncan <lduncan@suse.com>, Chris Leech <cleech@redhat.com>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: <open-iscsi@googlegroups.com>, <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linfeilong@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] scsi:iscsi: Fix multiple iscsi session unbind event sent to userspace
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 22:17:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <89692b2b-90f7-e8e8-fa77-f14dbe996b72@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ad54a5dc-b18f-e0e6-4391-1214e5729562@oracle.com>

On 2022/11/9 11:47, Mike Christie wrote:
> On 11/7/22 7:44 PM, Wenchao Hao wrote:
>> I found an issue that kernel would send ISCSI_KEVENT_UNBIND_SESSION
>> for multiple times which should be fixed.
>>  
>> +static char *iscsi_session_target_state_names[] = {
>> +	"UNBOUND",
>> +	"ALLOCATED",
>> +	"SCANNED",
>> +	"UNBINDING",
>> +};
> 
> I think maybe Lee meant you to do something like:
> 
> static int iscsi_target_state_to_name[] = {
> 	[ISCSI_SESSION_TARGET_UNBOUND] = "UNBOUND",
> 	[ISCSI_SESSION_TARGET_ALLOCATED] = "ALLOCATED",
> 	.....
> 
> 

Define array as following and remove previous helper function:

static char *iscsi_session_target_state_name[] = {
       [ISCSI_SESSION_TARGET_UNBOUND]   = "UNBOUND",
       [ISCSI_SESSION_TARGET_ALLOCATED] = "ALLOCATED",
       [ISCSI_SESSION_TARGET_SCANNED]   = "SCANNED",
       [ISCSI_SESSION_TARGET_UNBINDING] = "UNBINDING",
};

Reference the array directly:

static ssize_t
show_priv_session_target_state(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
                       char *buf)
{
       struct iscsi_cls_session *session = iscsi_dev_to_session(dev->parent);
       return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n",
                       iscsi_session_target_state_name[session->target_state]);
}

>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&session->lock, flags);
>> +	if (session->target_state == ISCSI_SESSION_TARGET_ALLOCATED) {
>> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&session->lock, flags);
>> +		if (session->ida_used)
>> +			ida_free(&iscsi_sess_ida, session->target_id);
>> +		ISCSI_DBG_TRANS_SESSION(session, "Donot unbind sesison: allocated\n");
> 
> Could you change the error message to "Skipping target unbinding: Session not yet scanned.\n"
> 
>> +		goto unbind_session_exit;
>> +	}
> 
> Just add a newline/return here.

Actually we should skip unbind this session if call into __iscsi_unbind_session() with target state
is ALLOCATED. So I removed the check, and check only one condition in __iscsi_unbind_session(): if the
target state is SCANNED.

> 
> I think you want to move both state checks to after the we take the host lock and
> session lock after the line above. You don't have to take the lock multiple times
> and we can drop the target_id == ISCSI_MAX_TARGET since it would then rely on the
> state checks (I left out the ISCSI_DBG_TRANS_SESSION because I'm lazy):
> 
> 	bool remove_target = false;
> .....
> 
> 
I think it's not necessary to add a flag remove_target, here is my changes for function __iscsi_unbind_session:

@@ -1966,23 +1977,28 @@ static void __iscsi_unbind_session(struct work_struct *work)
        /* Prevent new scans and make sure scanning is not in progress */
        mutex_lock(&ihost->mutex);
        spin_lock_irqsave(&session->lock, flags);
-       if (session->target_id == ISCSI_MAX_TARGET) {
+       if (session->target_state != ISCSI_SESSION_TARGET_SCANNED) {
                spin_unlock_irqrestore(&session->lock, flags);
                mutex_unlock(&ihost->mutex);
-               goto unbind_session_exit;
+               ISCSI_DBG_TRANS_SESSION(session, "Skipping target unbinding: Session is %s.\n",
+                                       iscsi_session_target_state_name[session->target_state]);
+               return;
        }
-
        target_id = session->target_id;
        session->target_id = ISCSI_MAX_TARGET;
+       session->target_state = ISCSI_SESSION_TARGET_UNBINDING;
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&session->lock, flags);
        mutex_unlock(&ihost->mutex);
 
        scsi_remove_target(&session->dev);
 
+       spin_lock_irqsave(&session->lock, flags);
+       session->target_state = ISCSI_SESSION_TARGET_UNBOUND;
+       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&session->lock, flags);
+
        if (session->ida_used)
                ida_free(&iscsi_sess_ida, target_id);
 
-unbind_session_exit:
        iscsi_session_event(session, ISCSI_KEVENT_UNBIND_SESSION);
        ISCSI_DBG_TRANS_SESSION(session, "Completed target removal\n");
 }

And the function looks like following after change:

static void __iscsi_unbind_session(struct work_struct *work)
{
	struct iscsi_cls_session *session =
			container_of(work, struct iscsi_cls_session,
				     unbind_work);
	struct Scsi_Host *shost = iscsi_session_to_shost(session);
	struct iscsi_cls_host *ihost = shost->shost_data;
	unsigned long flags;
	unsigned int target_id;

	ISCSI_DBG_TRANS_SESSION(session, "Unbinding session\n");

	/* Prevent new scans and make sure scanning is not in progress */
	mutex_lock(&ihost->mutex);
	spin_lock_irqsave(&session->lock, flags);
	if (session->target_state != ISCSI_SESSION_TARGET_SCANNED) {
		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&session->lock, flags);
		mutex_unlock(&ihost->mutex);
		ISCSI_DBG_TRANS_SESSION(session, "Skipping target unbinding: Session is %s.\n",
					iscsi_session_target_state_name[session->target_state]);
		return;
	}
	target_id = session->target_id;
	session->target_id = ISCSI_MAX_TARGET;
	session->target_state = ISCSI_SESSION_TARGET_UNBINDING;
	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&session->lock, flags);
	mutex_unlock(&ihost->mutex);

	scsi_remove_target(&session->dev);

	spin_lock_irqsave(&session->lock, flags);
	session->target_state = ISCSI_SESSION_TARGET_UNBOUND;
	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&session->lock, flags);

	if (session->ida_used)
		ida_free(&iscsi_sess_ida, target_id);

	iscsi_session_event(session, ISCSI_KEVENT_UNBIND_SESSION);
	ISCSI_DBG_TRANS_SESSION(session, "Completed target removal\n");
}




  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-21 14:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-08  1:44 [PATCH v6] scsi:iscsi: Fix multiple iscsi session unbind event sent to userspace Wenchao Hao
2022-11-09  3:47 ` Mike Christie
2022-11-21 14:17   ` Wenchao Hao [this message]
2022-11-22  7:02     ` Antw: [EXT] " Ulrich Windl
2022-11-22 16:53     ` Mike Christie
2022-11-22 17:29       ` Wenchao Hao
2022-11-22 18:15         ` Mike Christie
2022-11-23 14:21           ` Wenchao Hao
2022-11-09  5:08 ` Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=89692b2b-90f7-e8e8-fa77-f14dbe996b72@huawei.com \
    --to=haowenchao@huawei.com \
    --cc=cleech@redhat.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=lduncan@suse.com \
    --cc=linfeilong@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=michael.christie@oracle.com \
    --cc=open-iscsi@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).