linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@broadcom.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	sathya.prakash@broadcom.com,
	suganath-prabu.subramani@broadcom.com,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@broadcom.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	adi@kriegisch.at
Subject: Re: Report in downstream Debian: mpt3sas broken with xen dom0 with update to 5.10.149 in 5.10.y.
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 08:38:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <947cb58c-9b3b-c018-0b46-66122ea1ce46@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <016732f4-d129-69bb-4b5f-82198407ee5e@suse.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3646 bytes --]

On 24.10.22 14:55, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 24.10.22 13:56, Sreekanth Reddy wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 6:57 AM Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/21/22 02:22, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>>>> We got the following report in Debian after an update from 5.10.140 to
>>>> the current 5.10.149. Full quoting below (from
>>>> https://bugs.debian.org/1022126). Does this ring some bell about known
>>>> regressions?
>>>
>>> Only three mpt3sas changes are new in v5.10.149 compared to v5.10.140:
>>> $ git log --format=oneline v5.10.140..v5.10.149
>>> 2b9aba0c5d58e141e32bb1bb4c7cd91d19f075b8 scsi: mpt3sas: Fix return value 
>>> check of dma_get_required_mask()
>>> e7fafef9830c4a01e60f76e3860a9bef0262378d scsi: mpt3sas: Force PCIe 
>>> scatterlist allocations to be within same 4 GB region
>>> ea10a652ad2ae2cf3eced6f632a5c98f26727057 scsi: mpt3sas: Fix use-after-free 
>>> warning
>>>
>>> Sreekanth and Suganath, can you help with bisecting this issue? For the
>>> full report, see also 
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/Y1JkuKTjVYrOWbvm@eldamar.lan/.
>>
>> This issue is getting observed after having the below patch changes,
>> 2b9aba0c5d58e141e32bb1bb4c7cd91d19f075b8 scsi: mpt3sas: Fix return
>> value check of dma_get_required_mask()
>>
>> What is happening is that on Xen hypervisor, this
>> dma_get_required_mask() API always returns a 32 bit DMA mask. I.e. It
>> says that the minimum DMA mask required to access the host memory is
>> 32 bit and hence mpt3sas driver is setting the DMA mask to 32bit. So,
>> on a 64 bit machine, if the driver set's the DMA mask to 32 bit then
>> SWIOTLB's bounce buffer comes into picture during IOs. Since these
>> bounce buffers are limited in size and hence we observe the IO hang if
>> the large IOs are issued.
>>
>> I am not sure whether this API's return value is correct or not in the
>> Xen environment. If it is correct then I have to modify the driver to
>> not use this API and directly set the DMA mask to 64 bit if the system
>> is a 64bit machine.
> 
> Please recheck the backported patch in 5.10.y. It is _wrong_. The backport
> has:
> 
> --- a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_base.c
> @@ -2993,7 +2993,7 @@ _base_config_dma_addressing(struct MPT3SAS_ADAPTER *ioc, 
> struct pci_dev *pdev)
> 
>          if (ioc->is_mcpu_endpoint ||
>              sizeof(dma_addr_t) == 4 || ioc->use_32bit_dma ||
> -           dma_get_required_mask(&pdev->dev) <= 32)
> +           dma_get_required_mask(&pdev->dev) <= DMA_BIT_MASK(32))
>                  ioc->dma_mask = 32;
>          /* Set 63 bit DMA mask for all SAS3 and SAS35 controllers */
>          else if (ioc->hba_mpi_version_belonged > MPI2_VERSION)
> 
> While the upstream patch has:
> 
> +       if (ioc->is_mcpu_endpoint || sizeof(dma_addr_t) == 4 ||
> +           dma_get_required_mask(&pdev->dev) <= 32) {
>                  ioc->dma_mask = 32;
> +               coherent_dma_mask = dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);

Sorry for this mistake of mine, which seems to have been caused by a git
inconsistency, as the upstream source is still showing the line

   dma_get_required_mask(&pdev->dev) <= 32

I didn't double check which upstream patch was referenced by the backport
patch, but looked at the output of "git blame" to look at the last patch
older than the backport changing the line in question.

I didn't even think of the possibility that git could be wrong.


Juergen

[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 3149 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 495 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-25  6:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-21  9:22 Report in downstream Debian: mpt3sas broken with xen dom0 with update to 5.10.149 in 5.10.y Salvatore Bonaccorso
2022-10-23  1:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-10-24 11:56   ` Sreekanth Reddy
2022-10-24 12:51     ` James Bottomley
2022-10-24 13:20       ` Juergen Gross
2022-10-24 16:58         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-24 17:28           ` Andrew Cooper
2022-10-24 17:32             ` Christoph Hellwig
     [not found]             ` <20230314111752.EGroupware.TiNRv1BSroWqKL7zQtfNLJ8@_>
2023-03-14 11:23               ` Juergen Gross
2023-03-14 11:41                 ` Andrew Cooper
2023-03-14 12:07                   ` Salvatore Bonaccorso
2022-10-24 12:55     ` Juergen Gross
2022-10-24 18:50       ` James Bottomley
2022-10-25  4:32         ` Juergen Gross
2022-10-25  6:38       ` Juergen Gross [this message]
2022-10-24 14:58     ` Adi Kriegisch
2022-10-24 17:30     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=947cb58c-9b3b-c018-0b46-66122ea1ce46@suse.com \
    --to=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@broadcom.com \
    --cc=adi@kriegisch.at \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=carnil@debian.org \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=sathya.prakash@broadcom.com \
    --cc=sreekanth.reddy@broadcom.com \
    --cc=suganath-prabu.subramani@broadcom.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).