From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD408C433EF for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 18:54:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242053AbhLJS6b (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Dec 2021 13:58:31 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:21387 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232148AbhLJS6a (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Dec 2021 13:58:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1639162495; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Z8/jLpkPkpa/1rZSiq6Pu8X7FeoiXVsgqwxR4PDhzsY=; b=X9fKUuQF+xmgSmQeJAcsDGpqwmfyYuZIRr7cm3KRNL6GKQAXX7RZkjoORmK8lr6hD/nPXK BUcWHrDdJGGSaUoTFshqBM442imB1KTNgYqXefTkiZPch/2RSv73wZ1jxMslCVEqsDri6G ugwO0nnN5llErJNsf2VRWlZv3uz5C4M= Received: from mail-lf1-f70.google.com (mail-lf1-f70.google.com [209.85.167.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-604-miRjl8VsMtqA2k9eBBTGxw-1; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 13:54:53 -0500 X-MC-Unique: miRjl8VsMtqA2k9eBBTGxw-1 Received: by mail-lf1-f70.google.com with SMTP id q26-20020ac2515a000000b0040adfeb8132so4425643lfd.9 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 10:54:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Z8/jLpkPkpa/1rZSiq6Pu8X7FeoiXVsgqwxR4PDhzsY=; b=UqQha43iIhSxlUs9KvoSyp/OE7htSCBFjqDDwTJNYiNzOsSVef0i4jKWSs/7rQgXGJ Fu2+a9tdJLtpnnALfIz4WLNqB0u41q94t/+Nig0NWhky2bRdNhaqRHgKZUFi7xh+sf40 lEaSU40MFnJbM9/T+QQCzMSgTZvml3eAQcPiysIfx6Jl37oXDff7C6y9cjiZTfAF57YD sFZgul4W3cPPbf0Kostb/Goo2lzyweE1CuEst8tmpxZMLThCdl7fCv8DHsoh6sP0PH68 VffZfGK6gw+I4gsKyGVU1RPIvDvAQ9J3Eo2xK+wo5m3cM4dwlaVJJQoGf5uB2FXFu4wg lb8Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532P9YtMSf5Wk7M6GOF9yCWWfY83N2uMpu/N3gPV6dgDL59zMvZl jtwTiQb7nv+ODXBnwQGF2u4nNUnOeUuKi4WoBfG36YTtQkHdqmo9TFXIlbTC4Mdp3TpdF5vQUV6 QNRKMXyeZ54opskWr0E46KaCfiuik8KhPdxDPkQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:4024:: with SMTP id br36mr14222071lfb.137.1639162492261; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 10:54:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyZxrADo9jepEXUsylfOenB+SdQLJrls+4HZ8IrmtQPhabf4gI2ORq9UTW57nabamLAUBTRgU0K2of0nKr3ae4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:4024:: with SMTP id br36mr14222018lfb.137.1639162491964; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 10:54:51 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210903152430.244937-1-nitesh@redhat.com> <87bl29l5c6.ffs@tglx> <87ilvwxpt7.ffs@tglx> In-Reply-To: <87ilvwxpt7.ffs@tglx> From: Nitesh Lal Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 13:54:40 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/14] genirq: Cleanup the abuse of irq_set_affinity_hint() To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" , Juri Lelli , Dick Kennedy , Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com, sriharsha.basavapatna@broadcom.com, somnath.kotur@broadcom.com, huangguangbin2@huawei.com, huangdaode@huawei.com, Frederic Weisbecker , Alex Belits , Bjorn Helgaas , rostedt@goodmis.org, Peter Zijlstra , Jesse Brandeburg , Robin Murphy , Ingo Molnar , jbrandeb@kernel.org, akpm@linuxfoundation.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, stephen@networkplumber.org, rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com, chris.friesen@windriver.com, Marc Zyngier , Neil Horman , pjwaskiewicz@gmail.com, Stefan Assmann , Tomas Henzl , james.smart@broadcom.com, Ken Cox , faisal.latif@intel.com, shiraz.saleem@intel.com, tariqt@nvidia.com, Alaa Hleihel , Kamal Heib , borisp@nvidia.com, saeedm@nvidia.com, "Nikolova, Tatyana E" , "Ismail, Mustafa" , Al Stone , Leon Romanovsky , Chandrakanth Patil , bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, chunkuang.hu@kernel.org, yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com, baolin.wang7@gmail.com, Petr Oros , Ming Lei , Ewan Milne , jejb@linux.ibm.com, kabel@kernel.org, Viresh Kumar , Jakub Kicinski , kashyap.desai@broadcom.com, Sumit Saxena , shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com, sathya.prakash@broadcom.com, Sreekanth Reddy , suganath-prabu.subramani@broadcom.com, ley.foon.tan@intel.com, jbrunet@baylibre.com, johannes@sipsolutions.net, snelson@pensando.io, lewis.hanly@microchip.com, benve@cisco.com, _govind@gmx.com, jassisinghbrar@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 1:44 PM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 10 2021 at 08:51, Nitesh Lal wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 5:16 PM Nitesh Lal wrote: > >> > The more general question is whether I should queue all the others or > >> > whether some subsystem would prefer to pull in a tagged commit on top of > >> > rc1. I'm happy to carry them all of course. > >> > > >> > >> I am fine either way. > >> In the past, while I was asking for more testing help I was asked if the > >> SCSI changes are part of Martins's scsi-fixes tree as that's something > >> Broadcom folks test to check for regression. > >> So, maybe Martin can pull this up? > >> > > > > Gentle ping. > > Any thoughts on the above query? > > As nobody cares, I'll pick it up. > Sounds good to me. Thank you! -- Nitesh