linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Doug Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: sg: fix v3 compat read/write interface
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 10:32:56 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjBbi2xJZw+7Wqtt3W_mOUSPU2N4w-OES9WUUyXt-DnCg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191204140812.2761761-1-arnd@arndb.de>

On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 6:08 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>
> To address both of these, move the definition of compat_sg_io_hdr
> into a scsi/sg.h to make it visible to sg.c and rewrite the logic
> for reading req_pack_id as well as the size check to a simpler
> version that gets the expected results.

I think the patch is a good thing, except for this part:

> @@ -575,6 +561,14 @@ sg_new_read(Sg_fd * sfp, char __user *buf, size_t count, Sg_request * srp)
>         int err = 0, err2;
>         int len;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> +       if (in_compat_syscall()) {
> +               if (count < sizeof(struct compat_sg_io_hdr)) {
> +                       err = -EINVAL;
> +                       goto err_out;
> +               }
> +       } else
> +#endif
>         if (count < SZ_SG_IO_HDR) {
>                 err = -EINVAL;
>                 goto err_out;

Yes, yes, I know we do things like that in some other places too, but
I really detest this kind of ifdeffery.

That

         } else
  #endif
         if (count < SZ_SG_IO_HDR) {

is just evil. Please don't add things like this where the #ifdef
section has subtle semantic continuations outside of it. If somebody
adds a statement in between there, it now acts completely wrong.

I think you can remove the #ifdef entirely. If CONFIG_COMPAT isn't
set, I think in_compat_syscall() just turns to 0, and the code gets
optimized away.

Hmm?

               Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-04 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-30 18:10 [GIT PULL] first round of SCSI updates for the 5.4+ merge window James Bottomley
2019-12-02 21:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-02 22:40   ` James Bottomley
2019-12-04 14:05   ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-12-04 14:08     ` [PATCH] scsi: sg: fix v3 compat read/write interface Arnd Bergmann
2019-12-04 18:32       ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2019-12-04 20:35         ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-12-02 22:00 ` [GIT PULL] first round of SCSI updates for the 5.4+ merge window pr-tracker-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHk-=wjBbi2xJZw+7Wqtt3W_mOUSPU2N4w-OES9WUUyXt-DnCg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).