From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F421C433DB for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 06:04:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFE061A1B for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 06:04:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229659AbhCYGEV (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 02:04:21 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54388 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229548AbhCYGEU (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 02:04:20 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x631.google.com (mail-ej1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::631]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02770C06174A for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 23:04:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x631.google.com with SMTP id ce10so988050ejb.6 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 23:04:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ionos.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xc4qm/kccB64ZL/Z9kIVPCd5F8VTe+9UeOHA57uzuDo=; b=Xepk9gpeltv5ao4YB7k933Z2na67+ORzQZsGHe1dOWWR5SdL6hQ/B5dPEXqYB1LTL1 DHY0HDlJLo8pAML95Fya3K/PMaH9MrjqmlWk9LDkwXZeNmboxJEsaQaugBbKlP/OSjcL OqM4JogopG0DFkhbznUeW6uOrfaEFJJx7iCOt8qrX9SDYlK+8IjyX2fkpapDtdlnNyN6 mHX6409+8FL+QAkklr0xN2dStv/SFBwznywoBVLqTBEyVKb2pIgMBVYv/w9l4/ICNDbw Gudgoz3OaPMf4Q15PHLlgCXw+MFG8V1b0K5/Zkh0mesmRrHHd2LaHBZszrVcrsZ2wfEg rl6A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xc4qm/kccB64ZL/Z9kIVPCd5F8VTe+9UeOHA57uzuDo=; b=HsfM9XGvJDDDTradEBsN2irk1gq3sqrN27Zd2mIltfXIU0N4/SNeTbZlfF87p9k6o/ zUYg13gDorq0POsN2lWKtZp7s3WRN+HtrvBMWNwTxYGkQKJXuCiXWFXgpSZXZNDbXxod 6XRKi43GybIt4Doo4NvlOkSE9syeIrPqJlIUsGvycL9winO9MROsWB0HIGfESRBO5EwS M9kzIcaz2aX3UGfATPFT9Aw0RuklJ7KaCMy89uXcRiXy+eNM2RiNgCc7XGrnCXibAhqU KHPPZyAGiXQbIKOjzPl1I7Q4iRhxDTsQXltCcctxHeByMMgj2uVmfsQ7ySKYKTU/3/II ZAag== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531XXmklYTNBdro23+yGzrpKtxJLaYste6JpfmFIm0on/RPPJ1GS xBMX1Kmg4rSfNfm5OS3nIGnKLzDva8zY72AtidDu6Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwcFCFiPOaodVd0Mf4CXS6pKqTHYocbxwDcRsMzrJ0uUS66+qJFLfMK62zXPHmaQYDZlnZ3Dbk5yvJ5GvzvlG0= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:76a3:: with SMTP id jw3mr7663063ejc.353.1616652258729; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 23:04:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <009d01d71cb1$3fbd5200$bf37f600$@ai0.uk> <012c01d720f7$361de9e0$a259bda0$@ai0.uk> In-Reply-To: <012c01d720f7$361de9e0$a259bda0$@ai0.uk> From: Jinpu Wang Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 07:04:07 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] pm8001: Adaptec 6805H fails to initialize after v5.10.0 To: Ash Izat , Viswas G Cc: Jack Wang , Ruksar Devadi , Vasanthalakshmi.Tharmarajan@microchip.com, Linux SCSI Mailinglist Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Hi Ash, hi Viswas, On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:46 PM Ash Izat wrote: > > Hi Viswas, > > Patch applied on top of 5.12-rc4 and it is working perfectly now. > Double checked and without the patch the issue is still present in 5.12-rc4. > > Thank you very much for the prompt response. > > Is there any chance this will be backported to longterm (5.10) once it is merged? Thanks for testing. Viswas please submit a formal patch with Reported-and-tested-by from Ash, With the Fixes: 05c6c029a44d ("scsi: pm80xx: Increase number of supported queues") And add Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+ So it will be picked up when it is accepted by mainline, LTS maintainer will pick it up for stable 5.10+ Regards! Jinpu > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Viswas.G@microchip.com > > Sent: 24 March 2021 18:07 > > To: jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com; ash@ai0.uk; Ruksar.devadi@microchip.com; > > Vasanthalakshmi.Tharmarajan@microchip.com > > Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: RE: [REGRESSION] pm8001: Adaptec 6805H fails to initialize after > > v5.10.0 > > > > Hi Ash, > > > > Can you please try this patch ? > > > > Regards, > > Viswas G > >