From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
To: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move SG_GET_SCSI_ID from sg to scsi
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:30:12 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603261424590.15714@g5.osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0603262108500.13001@be1.lrz>
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Bodo Eggert wrote:
>
> Having a SCSI ID is a generic SCSI property
No it's not.
Havign a SCSI ID is a f*cking idiotic thing to do.
Only idiots like Joerg Schilling thinks that any such thing even _exists_.
It does not, never has, and never will.
The way you reach a SCSI device is through the device filename, and trying
to use controller/channel/id/lun naming IS INSANE!
Stop it now. We should kill that ioctl, not try to make it look like it is
sensible. It's not a sensible way to look up SCSI devices, and the fact
that some SCSI people think it is is doesn't make it so.
The fact is, you CANNOT ID a SCSI device that way. Look at how /sys does
it, and realize that there's a damn good reason we do it that way. We ID
the same device in many different ways, because different people want to
ID it differently.
You can ask "what's the first device we enumerated", you can ask "what's
the physical path to the device" or you can ask "what's the intrisic UUID
of the device". But the controller/channel/id/lun thing is just stupid.
You can look it up that way if you want to, but I refuse to have idiotic
interfaces that somehow try to make that the "official" name, when it
clearly is NOT.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-26 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-26 19:28 [PATCH] Move SG_GET_SCSI_ID from sg to scsi Bodo Eggert
2006-03-26 19:51 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-26 20:08 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-03-26 20:41 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-26 20:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-03-27 10:11 ` Bodo Eggert
2006-03-27 15:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-03-27 15:40 ` James Bottomley
2006-03-26 22:30 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2006-03-26 23:19 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-03-27 0:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-27 11:42 ` Bodo Eggert
2006-03-28 9:43 ` Matthias Andree
2006-03-27 15:03 ` Douglas Gilbert
2006-03-27 17:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-27 17:25 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-03-27 17:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-27 19:54 ` Alan Cox
2006-03-27 21:29 ` Douglas Gilbert
2006-03-28 7:37 ` Stefan Richter
2006-03-28 14:17 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-03-26 23:09 ` Stefan Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0603261424590.15714@g5.osdl.org \
--to=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=7eggert@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).