From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] scsi: core: Retry after a delay if the device is becoming ready
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 09:21:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YrupM8k8uG3HIRmt@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220628222131.14780-3-bvanassche@acm.org>
On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 03:21:30PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> If a logical unit reports that it is becoming ready, retry the command
> after a delay instead of retrying immediately.
>
> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> index 49ef864df581..fb7e363c4c00 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> @@ -625,10 +625,10 @@ enum scsi_disposition scsi_check_sense(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
> return NEEDS_RETRY;
> /*
> * if the device is in the process of becoming ready, we
> - * should retry.
> + * should retry after a delay.
> */
> if ((sshdr.asc == 0x04) && (sshdr.ascq == 0x01))
> - return NEEDS_RETRY;
> + return ADD_TO_MLQUEUE;
The above code & commit log just said changing to retry after a delay, but not
explains why, care to document reason why the delay is useful?
Thanks
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-29 1:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-28 22:21 [PATCH 0/3] Reduce ATA disk resume time Bart Van Assche
2022-06-28 22:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] scsi: core: Move the definition of SCSI_QUEUE_DELAY Bart Van Assche
2022-06-28 22:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] scsi: core: Retry after a delay if the device is becoming ready Bart Van Assche
2022-06-29 1:21 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2022-06-29 22:06 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-06-28 22:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] scsi: sd: Rework asynchronous resume support Bart Van Assche
2022-06-29 6:02 ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-06-30 16:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-06-30 16:23 ` John Garry
2022-06-30 18:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-06-30 19:28 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YrupM8k8uG3HIRmt@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).