linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	axboe@kernel.dk, jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	don.brace@microsemi.com, kashyap.desai@broadcom.com,
	sumit.saxena@broadcom.com, ming.lei@redhat.com,
	bvanassche@acm.org, hare@suse.com, hch@lst.de,
	shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	esc.storagedev@microsemi.com, chenxiang66@hisilicon.com,
	megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v7 06/12] blk-mq: Record active_queues_shared_sbitmap per tag_set for when using shared sbitmap
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 15:16:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a10a20de-d8e2-8505-65ec-1c26bfbf6cfc@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1591810159-240929-7-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com>

On 6/10/20 7:29 PM, John Garry wrote:
> For when using a shared sbitmap, no longer should the number of active
> request queues per hctx be relied on for when judging how to share the tag
> bitmap.
> 
> Instead maintain the number of active request queues per tag_set, and make
> the judgment based on that.
> 
> And since the blk_mq_tags.active_queues is no longer maintained, do not
> show it in debugfs.
> 
> Originally-from: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
> ---
>   block/blk-mq-debugfs.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++--
>   block/blk-mq-tag.c     | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>   block/blk-mq.c         |  2 ++
>   include/linux/blk-mq.h |  1 +
>   include/linux/blkdev.h |  1 +
>   5 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c b/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
> index 0fa3af41ab65..05b4be0c03d9 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
> @@ -458,17 +458,37 @@ static void blk_mq_debugfs_tags_show(struct seq_file *m,
>   	}
>   }
>   
> +static void blk_mq_debugfs_tags_shared_sbitmap_show(struct seq_file *m,
> +				     struct blk_mq_tags *tags)
> +{
> +	seq_printf(m, "nr_tags=%u\n", tags->nr_tags);
> +	seq_printf(m, "nr_reserved_tags=%u\n", tags->nr_reserved_tags);
> +
> +	seq_puts(m, "\nbitmap_tags:\n");
> +	sbitmap_queue_show(tags->bitmap_tags, m);
> +
> +	if (tags->nr_reserved_tags) {
> +		seq_puts(m, "\nbreserved_tags:\n");
> +		sbitmap_queue_show(tags->breserved_tags, m);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>   static int hctx_tags_show(void *data, struct seq_file *m)
>   {
>   	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = data;
>   	struct request_queue *q = hctx->queue;
> +	struct blk_mq_tag_set *set = q->tag_set;
>   	int res;
>   
>   	res = mutex_lock_interruptible(&q->sysfs_lock);
>   	if (res)
>   		goto out;
> -	if (hctx->tags)
> -		blk_mq_debugfs_tags_show(m, hctx->tags);
> +	if (hctx->tags) {
> +		if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(set))
> +			blk_mq_debugfs_tags_shared_sbitmap_show(m, hctx->tags);
> +		else
> +			blk_mq_debugfs_tags_show(m, hctx->tags);
> +	}
>   	mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock);
>   
>   out:
> @@ -802,6 +822,7 @@ static const struct blk_mq_debugfs_attr blk_mq_debugfs_hctx_shared_sbitmap_attrs
>   	{"dispatch", 0400, .seq_ops = &hctx_dispatch_seq_ops},
>   	{"busy", 0400, hctx_busy_show},
>   	{"ctx_map", 0400, hctx_ctx_map_show},
> +	{"tags", 0400, hctx_tags_show},
>   	{"sched_tags", 0400, hctx_sched_tags_show},
>   	{"sched_tags_bitmap", 0400, hctx_sched_tags_bitmap_show},
>   	{"io_poll", 0600, hctx_io_poll_show, hctx_io_poll_write},

I had been pondering this, too, when creating v6. Problem is that it'll 
show the tags per hctx, but as they are shared I guess the list looks 
pretty identical per hctx.
So I guess we should filter the tags per hctx to have only those active 
on that hctx displayed. But when doing so we can only print the 
in-flight tags, the others are not assigned to a hctx and as such we 
can't make a decision on which hctx they'll end up.

> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> index 7db16e49f6f6..6ca06b1c3a99 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> @@ -23,9 +23,19 @@
>    */
>   bool __blk_mq_tag_busy(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
>   {
> -	if (!test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state) &&
> -	    !test_and_set_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state))
> -		atomic_inc(&hctx->tags->active_queues);
> +	struct request_queue *q = hctx->queue;
> +	struct blk_mq_tag_set *set = q->tag_set;
> +
> +	if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(set)){
> +		if (!test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_HCTX_ACTIVE, &q->queue_flags) &&
> +		    !test_and_set_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_HCTX_ACTIVE, &q->queue_flags))
> +			atomic_inc(&set->active_queues_shared_sbitmap);
> +
> +	} else {
> +		if (!test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state) &&
> +		    !test_and_set_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state))
> +			atomic_inc(&hctx->tags->active_queues);
> +	}
>   
>   	return true;
>   }
At one point someone would need to educate me what this double 
'test_bit' and 'test_and_set_bit' is supposed to achieve.
Other than deliberately injecting a race condition ...

> @@ -47,11 +57,19 @@ void blk_mq_tag_wakeup_all(struct blk_mq_tags *tags, bool include_reserve)
>   void __blk_mq_tag_idle(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
>   {
>   	struct blk_mq_tags *tags = hctx->tags;
> -
> -	if (!test_and_clear_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state))
> -		return;
> -
> -	atomic_dec(&tags->active_queues);
> +	struct request_queue *q = hctx->queue;
> +	struct blk_mq_tag_set *set = q->tag_set;
> +
> +	if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(q->tag_set)){
> +		if (!test_and_clear_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_HCTX_ACTIVE,
> +					&q->queue_flags))
> +			return;
> +		atomic_dec(&set->active_queues_shared_sbitmap);
> +	} else {
> +		if (!test_and_clear_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state))
> +			return;
> +		atomic_dec(&tags->active_queues);
> +	}
>   
>   	blk_mq_tag_wakeup_all(tags, false);
>   }
> @@ -65,12 +83,11 @@ static inline bool hctx_may_queue(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data,
>   {
>   	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = data->hctx;
>   	struct request_queue *q = data->q;
> +	struct blk_mq_tag_set *set = q->tag_set;
>   	unsigned int depth, users;
>   
>   	if (!hctx || !(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_TAG_QUEUE_SHARED))
>   		return true;
> -	if (!test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state))
> -		return true;
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * Don't try dividing an ant
> @@ -78,7 +95,15 @@ static inline bool hctx_may_queue(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data,
>   	if (bt->sb.depth == 1)
>   		return true;
>   
> -	users = atomic_read(&hctx->tags->active_queues);
> +	if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(q->tag_set)) {
> +		if (!test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &q->queue_flags))
> +			return true;
> +		users = atomic_read(&set->active_queues_shared_sbitmap);
> +	} else {
> +		if (!test_bit(BLK_MQ_S_TAG_ACTIVE, &hctx->state))
> +			return true;
> +		users = atomic_read(&hctx->tags->active_queues);
> +	}
>   	if (!users)
>   		return true;
>   
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 0f7e062a1665..f73a2f9c58bd 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -3350,6 +3350,8 @@ int blk_mq_alloc_tag_set(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set)
>   		goto out_free_mq_map;
>   
>   	if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(set)) {
> +		atomic_set(&set->active_queues_shared_sbitmap, 0);
> +
>   		if (!blk_mq_init_shared_sbitmap(set)) {
>   			ret = -ENOMEM;
>   			goto out_free_mq_rq_maps;
> diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> index 7b31cdb92a71..66711c7234db 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> @@ -252,6 +252,7 @@ struct blk_mq_tag_set {
>   	unsigned int		timeout;
>   	unsigned int		flags;
>   	void			*driver_data;
> +	atomic_t		active_queues_shared_sbitmap;
>   
>   	struct sbitmap_queue	__bitmap_tags;
>   	struct sbitmap_queue	__breserved_tags;
> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> index c536278bec9e..1b0087e8d01a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> @@ -619,6 +619,7 @@ struct request_queue {
>   #define QUEUE_FLAG_PCI_P2PDMA	25	/* device supports PCI p2p requests */
>   #define QUEUE_FLAG_ZONE_RESETALL 26	/* supports Zone Reset All */
>   #define QUEUE_FLAG_RQ_ALLOC_TIME 27	/* record rq->alloc_time_ns */
> +#define QUEUE_FLAG_HCTX_ACTIVE 28	/* at least one blk-mq hctx is active */
>   
>   #define QUEUE_FLAG_MQ_DEFAULT	((1 << QUEUE_FLAG_IO_STAT) |		\
>   				 (1 << QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_COMP))
> 
Other than that it looks fine.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke            Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@suse.de                               +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-11 13:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 123+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-10 17:29 [PATCH RFC v7 00/12] blk-mq/scsi: Provide hostwide shared tags for SCSI HBAs John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 01/12] blk-mq: rename BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED as BLK_MQ_F_TAG_QUEUE_SHARED John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 02/12] blk-mq: rename blk_mq_update_tag_set_depth() John Garry
2020-06-11  2:57   ` Ming Lei
2020-06-11  8:26     ` John Garry
2020-06-23 11:25       ` John Garry
2020-06-23 14:23         ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-24  8:13           ` Kashyap Desai
2020-06-29 16:18             ` John Garry
2020-08-10 16:51           ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-11  8:01             ` John Garry
2020-08-11 16:34               ` Kashyap Desai
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 03/12] blk-mq: Use pointers for blk_mq_tags bitmap tags John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 04/12] blk-mq: Facilitate a shared sbitmap per tagset John Garry
2020-06-11  3:37   ` Ming Lei
2020-06-11 10:09     ` John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 05/12] blk-mq: Record nr_active_requests per queue for when using shared sbitmap John Garry
2020-06-11  4:04   ` Ming Lei
2020-06-11 10:22     ` John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 06/12] blk-mq: Record active_queues_shared_sbitmap per tag_set " John Garry
2020-06-11 13:16   ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2020-06-11 14:22     ` John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 07/12] blk-mq: Add support in hctx_tags_bitmap_show() for a " John Garry
2020-06-11 13:19   ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-11 14:33     ` John Garry
2020-06-12  6:06       ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-29 15:32         ` About sbitmap_bitmap_show() and cleared bits (was Re: [PATCH RFC v7 07/12] blk-mq: Add support in hctx_tags_bitmap_show() for a shared sbitmap) John Garry
2020-06-30  6:33           ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-30  7:30             ` John Garry
2020-06-30 11:36               ` John Garry
2020-06-30 14:55           ` Bart Van Assche
2020-07-13  9:41         ` [PATCH RFC v7 07/12] blk-mq: Add support in hctx_tags_bitmap_show() for a shared sbitmap John Garry
2020-07-13 12:20           ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 08/12] scsi: Add template flag 'host_tagset' John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 09/12] scsi: hisi_sas: Switch v3 hw to MQ John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 10/12] megaraid_sas: switch fusion adapters " John Garry
2020-07-02 10:23   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-06  8:23     ` John Garry
2020-07-06  8:45       ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-06  9:26         ` John Garry
2020-07-06  9:40           ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-06 19:19       ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-07  7:58         ` John Garry
2020-07-07 14:45           ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-07 16:17             ` John Garry
2020-07-09 19:01               ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-10  8:10                 ` John Garry
2020-07-13  7:55                   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-13  8:42                     ` John Garry
2020-07-19 19:07                       ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-20  7:23                       ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-20  9:18                         ` John Garry
2020-07-21  1:13                         ` Ming Lei
2020-07-21  6:53                           ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-22  4:12                             ` Ming Lei
2020-07-22  5:30                               ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-22  8:04                                 ` Ming Lei
2020-07-22  9:32                                   ` John Garry
2020-07-23 14:07                                     ` Ming Lei
2020-07-23 17:29                                       ` John Garry
2020-07-24  2:47                                         ` Ming Lei
2020-07-28  7:54                                           ` John Garry
2020-07-28  8:45                                             ` Ming Lei
2020-07-29  5:25                                               ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-29 15:36                                                 ` Ming Lei
2020-07-29 18:31                                                   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-04  8:36                                                     ` Ming Lei
2020-08-04  9:27                                                       ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-05  8:40                                                         ` Ming Lei
2020-08-06 10:25                                                           ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-06 13:38                                                             ` Ming Lei
2020-08-06 14:37                                                               ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-06 15:29                                                                 ` Ming Lei
2020-08-08 19:05                                                                   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-09  2:16                                                                     ` Ming Lei
2020-08-10 16:38                                                                       ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-11  8:09                                                                         ` John Garry
2020-08-04 17:00                                               ` John Garry
2020-08-05  2:56                                                 ` Ming Lei
2020-07-28  8:01                                   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-08 11:31         ` John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 11/12] smartpqi: enable host tagset John Garry
2020-07-14 13:16   ` John Garry
2020-07-14 13:31     ` John Garry
2020-07-14 18:16       ` Don.Brace
2020-07-15  7:28         ` John Garry
2020-07-14 14:02     ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-18  8:33       ` John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 12/12] hpsa: enable host_tagset and switch to MQ John Garry
2020-07-14  7:37   ` John Garry
2020-07-14  7:41     ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-14  7:52       ` John Garry
2020-07-14  8:06         ` Ming Lei
2020-07-14  9:53           ` John Garry
2020-07-14 10:14             ` Ming Lei
2020-07-14 10:43               ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-14 10:19             ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-14 10:35               ` John Garry
2020-07-14 10:44               ` Ming Lei
2020-07-14 10:52                 ` John Garry
2020-07-14 12:04                   ` Ming Lei
2020-08-03 20:39         ` Don.Brace
2020-08-04  9:27           ` John Garry
2020-08-04 15:18             ` Don.Brace
2020-08-05 11:21               ` John Garry
2020-08-14 21:04                 ` Don.Brace
2020-08-17  8:00                   ` John Garry
2020-08-17 18:39                     ` Don.Brace
2020-08-18  7:14                       ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-16 16:14     ` Don.Brace
2020-07-16 19:45     ` Don.Brace
2020-07-17 10:11       ` John Garry
2020-06-11  3:07 ` [PATCH RFC v7 00/12] blk-mq/scsi: Provide hostwide shared tags for SCSI HBAs Ming Lei
2020-06-11  9:35   ` John Garry
2020-06-12 18:47     ` Kashyap Desai
2020-06-15  2:13       ` Ming Lei
2020-06-15  6:57         ` Kashyap Desai
2020-06-16  1:00           ` Ming Lei
2020-06-17 11:26             ` Kashyap Desai
2020-06-22  6:24               ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-23  0:55                 ` Ming Lei
2020-06-23 11:50                   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-06-23 12:11                   ` Kashyap Desai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a10a20de-d8e2-8505-65ec-1c26bfbf6cfc@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=don.brace@microsemi.com \
    --cc=esc.storagedev@microsemi.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com \
    --cc=sumit.saxena@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).