linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: take module reference during async scan
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 17:32:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a31b8640-307f-a14f-7cf8-7673fa8a4ff1@interlog.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1599500808.4232.19.camel@HansenPartnership.com>

On 2020-09-07 1:46 p.m., James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-09-07 at 17:47 +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
>> During an async scan the driver shost->hostt structures are used,
>> that may cause issues when the driver is removed at that time.
>> As protection take the module reference.
> 
> Can I just ask what issues?  Today, our module model is that
> scsi_device_get() bumps the module refcount and therefore makes the
> module ineligible to be removed.  scsi_host_get() doesn't do this
> because the way the host model is supposed to be coded, we can call
> remove at any time but the module won't get freed until the last put of
> the host.  I can see we have a potential problem with
> scsi_forget_host() racing with the async scan thread ... is that what
> you see? What's supposed to happen is that scsi_device_get() starts
> failing as soon as the module begins it's exit routine, so if a scan is
> in progress, it can't add any new devices ... in theory this means that
> the list is stable for scsi_forget_host(), so knowing how that
> assumption is breaking would be useful.

James,
If you think it is bullet-proof try using CONFIG_DEBUG_TEST_DRIVER_REMOVE=y .
John Garry reported that:

  # insmod scsi_debug.ko

Gave errors like this:

[  140.115244] debugfs: Directory 'sde' with parent 'block' already present!
[  140.376426] debugfs: Directory 'sde' with parent 'block' already present!
[  140.420613] sd 3:0:0:0: [sde] tag#40 access beyond end of device
[  140.426655] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev sde, sector 15984 op 
0x0:(READ) flags 0x80700 phys_seg 1 prio class 0
[  140.437319] sd 3:0:0:0: [sde] tag#41 access beyond end of device
[  140.443368] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev sde, sector 15984 op 
0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 1 prio class 0
...

Which wasn't the scsi_debug driver directly as it doesn't use debugfs. So
I suspect something is rotten in the mid-level.

When I tried to replicate John's config I couldn't even boot my Ubuntu
20.04 based system (with a MKP kernel). Seemed to fail/lockup before any
kernel prints came out to the serial port (yes, still useful), perhaps in
initrd. I'm guessing another, non-SCSI module caused the lockup. So I
gave up and turned off that config setting.

Doug Gilbert



  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-07 21:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-07 15:47 [PATCH] scsi: take module reference during async scan Tomas Henzl
2020-09-07 16:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-09-07 21:12   ` Tomas Henzl
2020-09-07 17:46 ` James Bottomley
2020-09-07 20:09   ` Tomas Henzl
2020-09-07 20:24     ` James Bottomley
2020-09-07 21:02       ` Tomas Henzl
2020-09-07 22:02         ` James Bottomley
2020-09-08  8:22           ` Tomas Henzl
2020-09-07 21:32   ` Douglas Gilbert [this message]
2020-09-07 22:56     ` James Bottomley
2020-09-08 14:04     ` John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a31b8640-307f-a14f-7cf8-7673fa8a4ff1@interlog.com \
    --to=dgilbert@interlog.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thenzl@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).