linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
To: zhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
Cc: bvanassche@acm.org, jejb@linux.ibm.com,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	yi.zhang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] scsi: core: fix uninit-value access of variable sshdr
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 11:05:18 +1100 (AEDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.21.1910171101460.32@nippy.intranet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1570850706-12063-1-git-send-email-zhengbin13@huawei.com>


On Sat, 12 Oct 2019, zhengbin wrote:

> kmsan report a warning in 5.1-rc4:
> 
> BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in sr_get_events drivers/scsi/sr.c:207 [inline]
> BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in sr_check_events+0x2cf/0x1090 drivers/scsi/sr.c:243
> CPU: 1 PID: 13858 Comm: syz-executor.0 Tainted: G    B             5.1.0-rc4+ #8
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Ubuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
> Call Trace:
>  __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
>  dump_stack+0x173/0x1d0 lib/dump_stack.c:113
>  kmsan_report+0x131/0x2a0 mm/kmsan/kmsan.c:619
>  __msan_warning+0x7a/0xf0 mm/kmsan/kmsan_instr.c:310
>  sr_get_events drivers/scsi/sr.c:207 [inline]
>  sr_check_events+0x2cf/0x1090 drivers/scsi/sr.c:243
> 
> The reason is as follows:
> sr_get_events
>   struct scsi_sense_hdr sshdr;  -->uninit
>   scsi_execute_req              -->If fail, will not set sshdr
>   scsi_sense_valid(&sshdr)      -->access sshdr
> 
> We can init sshdr in sr_get_events, but there have many callers of
> scsi_execute, scsi_execute_req, we have to troubleshoot all callers,
> the simpler way is init sshdr in __scsi_execute.
> 
> BTW: sr_do_ioctl should check whether sshdr is valid, fix this
> 
> Signed-off-by: zhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
> ---
> v1->v2: modify the comments suggested by Bart
> v2->v3: fix bug in sr_do_ioctl
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 7 +++++++
>  drivers/scsi/sr_ioctl.c | 5 +++++
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> index 5447738..d5e29c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> @@ -255,6 +255,13 @@ int __scsi_execute(struct scsi_device *sdev, const unsigned char *cmd,
>  	struct scsi_request *rq;
>  	int ret = DRIVER_ERROR << 24;
> 
> +	/*
> +	 * Zero-initialize sshdr for those callers that check the *sshdr
> +	 * contents even if no sense data is available.
> +	 */
> +	if (sshdr)
> +		memset(sshdr, 0, sizeof(struct scsi_sense_hdr));
> +
>  	req = blk_get_request(sdev->request_queue,
>  			data_direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE ?
>  			REQ_OP_SCSI_OUT : REQ_OP_SCSI_IN, BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT);

Does this have any effect? It appears __scsi_execute() calls 
scsi_normalize_sense(), which already does
memset(sshdr, 0, sizeof(struct scsi_sense_hdr)).

-- 

> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sr_ioctl.c b/drivers/scsi/sr_ioctl.c
> index ffcf902..335cfdd 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sr_ioctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sr_ioctl.c
> @@ -206,6 +206,11 @@ int sr_do_ioctl(Scsi_CD *cd, struct packet_command *cgc)
> 
>  	/* Minimal error checking.  Ignore cases we know about, and report the rest. */
>  	if (driver_byte(result) != 0) {
> +		if (!scsi_sense_valid(sshdr)) {
> +			err = -EIO;
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +
>  		switch (sshdr->sense_key) {
>  		case UNIT_ATTENTION:
>  			SDev->changed = 1;
> --
> 2.7.4
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-17  0:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-12  3:25 [PATCH v3] scsi: core: fix uninit-value access of variable sshdr zhengbin
2019-10-17  0:05 ` Finn Thain [this message]
2019-10-17  1:16   ` zhengbin (A)
2019-10-17  2:45 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-10-17  3:26   ` zhengbin (A)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.21.1910171101460.32@nippy.intranet \
    --to=fthain@telegraphics.com.au \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhengbin13@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).