From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@puri.sm>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 8/8] block: Do not accept any requests while suspended
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 08:36:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b257a342-0066-60a6-0bd1-801f502b6d96@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201209052951.16136-9-bvanassche@acm.org>
On 12/9/20 6:29 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
>
> blk_queue_enter() accepts BLK_MQ_REQ_PM requests independent of the runtime
> power management state. Now that SCSI domain validation no longer depends
> on this behavior, modify the behavior of blk_queue_enter() as follows:
> - Do not accept any requests while suspended.
> - Only process power management requests while suspending or resuming.
>
> Submitting BLK_MQ_REQ_PM requests to a device that is runtime suspended
> causes runtime-suspended devices not to resume as they should. The request
> which should cause a runtime resume instead gets issued directly, without
> resuming the device first. Of course the device can't handle it properly,
> the I/O fails, and the device remains suspended.
>
> The problem is fixed by checking that the queue's runtime-PM status
> isn't RPM_SUSPENDED before allowing a request to be issued, and
> queuing a runtime-resume request if it is. In particular, the inline
> blk_pm_request_resume() routine is renamed blk_pm_resume_queue() and
> the code is unified by merging the surrounding checks into the
> routine. If the queue isn't set up for runtime PM, or there currently
> is no restriction on allowed requests, the request is allowed.
> Likewise if the BLK_MQ_REQ_PM flag is set and the status isn't
> RPM_SUSPENDED. Otherwise a runtime resume is queued and the request
> is blocked until conditions are more suitable.
>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> Cc: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Reported-and-tested-by: Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@puri.sm>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> [ bvanassche: modified commit message and removed Cc: stable because without
> the previous patches from this series this patch would break parallel SCSI
> domain validation + introduced queue_rpm_status() ]
> ---
> block/blk-core.c | 7 ++++---
> block/blk-pm.h | 14 +++++++++-----
> include/linux/blkdev.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-09 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-09 5:29 [PATCH v5 0/8] Rework runtime suspend and SPI domain validation Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] block: Fix a race in the runtime power management code Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] block: Introduce BLK_MQ_REQ_PM Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09 6:06 ` Can Guo
2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] ide: Do not set the RQF_PREEMPT flag for sense requests Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] ide: Mark power management requests with RQF_PM instead of RQF_PREEMPT Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] scsi_transport_spi: Set RQF_PM for domain validation commands Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09 7:34 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] scsi: Only process PM requests if rpm_status != RPM_ACTIVE Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09 6:06 ` Can Guo
2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] block: Remove RQF_PREEMPT and BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09 6:05 ` Can Guo
2020-12-09 5:29 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] block: Do not accept any requests while suspended Bart Van Assche
2020-12-09 6:04 ` Can Guo
2020-12-09 7:36 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2020-12-09 16:44 ` [PATCH v5 0/8] Rework runtime suspend and SPI domain validation Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b257a342-0066-60a6-0bd1-801f502b6d96@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.kepplinger@puri.sm \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).