linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@puri.sm>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@puri.sm
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: sd: add runtime pm to open / release
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 10:52:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3fe36a9-b785-a5c4-c90d-b8fa10f4272f@puri.sm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1596047349.4356.84.camel@HansenPartnership.com>

On 29.07.20 20:29, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-07-29 at 14:25 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 06:43:48PM +0200, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> [...]
>>>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
>>>>> @@ -554,16 +554,8 @@ int scsi_check_sense(struct scsi_cmnd
>>>>> *scmd)
>>>>>                  * so that we can deal with it there.
>>>>>                  */
>>>>>                 if (scmd->device->expecting_cc_ua) {
>>>>> -                       /*
>>>>> -                        * Because some device does not queue
>>>>> unit
>>>>> -                        * attentions correctly, we carefully
>>>>> check
>>>>> -                        * additional sense code and qualifier
>>>>> so as
>>>>> -                        * not to squash media change unit
>>>>> attention.
>>>>> -                        */
>>>>> -                       if (sshdr.asc != 0x28 || sshdr.ascq !=
>>>>> 0x00)
>>>>> {
>>>>> -                               scmd->device->expecting_cc_ua =
>>>>> 0;
>>>>> -                               return NEEDS_RETRY;
>>>>> -                       }
>>>>> +                       scmd->device->expecting_cc_ua = 0;
>>>>> +                       return NEEDS_RETRY;
>>>>
>>>> Well, yes, but you can't do this because it would lose us media
>>>> change events in the non-suspend/resume case which we really
>>>> don't want.  That's why I was suggesting a new flag.
>>>>
>>>> James
>>>
>>> also if I set expecting_cc_ua in resume() only, like I did?
>>
>> That wouldn't make any difference.  The information sent by your
>> card reader has sshdr.asc == 0x28 and sshdr.ascq == 0x00 (you can see
>> it in the log).  So because of the code here in scsi_check_sense(),
>> which you can't change, the Unit Attention sent by the card reader
>> would not be  retried even if you do set the flag in resume().
> 
> But if we had a new flag, like expecting_media_change, you could set
> that in resume and we could condition the above test in the code on it
> and reset it and do a retry if it gets set.  I'm not saying we have to
> do it this way, but it sounds like we have to do something in the
> kernel, so I think the flag will become necessary but there might be a
> bit of policy based dance around how it gets set in the kernel (to
> avoid losing accurate media change events).
> 
> James
> 

Maybe I should just start a new discussion with a patch, but the below
is what makes sense to me (when I understand you correctly) and seems to
work. I basically add a new flag, so that the old flags behave unchanged
and only call it during *runtime* resume for SD cards:


--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
@@ -553,15 +553,21 @@ int scsi_check_sense(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
                 * information that we should pass up to the upper-level
driver
                 * so that we can deal with it there.
                 */
-               if (scmd->device->expecting_cc_ua) {
+               if (scmd->device->expecting_cc_ua ||
+                   scmd->device->expecting_media_change) {
                        /*
                         * Because some device does not queue unit
                         * attentions correctly, we carefully check
                         * additional sense code and qualifier so as
-                        * not to squash media change unit attention.
+                        * not to squash media change unit attention;
+                        * unless expecting_media_change is set, indicating
+                        * that the media (most likely) didn't change
+                        * but a device only believes so (for example
+                        * because of suspend/resume).
                         */
-                       if (sshdr.asc != 0x28 || sshdr.ascq != 0x00) {
-                               scmd->device->expecting_cc_ua = 0;
+                       if ((sshdr.asc != 0x28 || sshdr.ascq != 0x00) ||
+                           scmd->device->expecting_media_change) {
+                               scmd->device->expecting_media_change = 0;
                                return NEEDS_RETRY;
                        }
                }
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
index d90fefffe31b..b647fab2b663 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ static void sd_shutdown(struct device *);
 static int sd_suspend_system(struct device *);
 static int sd_suspend_runtime(struct device *);
 static int sd_resume(struct device *);
+static int sd_resume_runtime(struct device *);
 static void sd_rescan(struct device *);
 static blk_status_t sd_init_command(struct scsi_cmnd *SCpnt);
 static void sd_uninit_command(struct scsi_cmnd *SCpnt);
@@ -574,7 +575,7 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops sd_pm_ops = {
        .poweroff               = sd_suspend_system,
        .restore                = sd_resume,
        .runtime_suspend        = sd_suspend_runtime,
-       .runtime_resume         = sd_resume,
+       .runtime_resume         = sd_resume_runtime,
 };

 static struct scsi_driver sd_template = {
@@ -3652,6 +3653,21 @@ static int sd_resume(struct device *dev)
        return ret;
 }

+static int sd_resume_runtime(struct device *dev)
+{
+       struct scsi_disk *sdkp = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+       /* Some SD cardreaders report media change when resuming from
suspend
+        * because they can't keep track during suspend. */
+
+       /* XXX This is not unproblematic though: We won't notice when a card
+        * was really changed during runtime suspend! We basically rely
on users
+        * to unmount or suspend before doing so. */
+       sdkp->device->expecting_media_change = 1;
+
+       return sd_resume(dev);
+}
+
 /**
  *     init_sd - entry point for this driver (both when built in or when
  *     a module).
diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_device.h b/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
index bc5909033d13..8c8f053f71c8 100644
--- a/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
+++ b/include/scsi/scsi_device.h
@@ -169,6 +169,8 @@ struct scsi_device {
                                 * this device */
        unsigned expecting_cc_ua:1; /* Expecting a CHECK_CONDITION/UNIT_ATTN
                                     * because we did a bus reset. */
+       unsigned expecting_media_change:1; /* Expecting media change
ASC/ASCQ
+                                             when it actually doesn't
change */
        unsigned use_10_for_rw:1; /* first try 10-byte read / write */
        unsigned use_10_for_ms:1; /* first try 10-byte mode sense/select */
        unsigned set_dbd_for_ms:1; /* Set "DBD" field in mode sense */

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-30  8:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-23 11:10 [PATCH] scsi: sd: add runtime pm to open / release Martin Kepplinger
2020-06-24 13:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-06-25  8:16   ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-06-25 14:52     ` Alan Stern
2020-06-26  3:53     ` Bart Van Assche
2020-06-26 15:07     ` Bart Van Assche
2020-06-26 15:44       ` Alan Stern
2020-06-28  2:37         ` Bart Van Assche
2020-06-28 13:10           ` Alan Stern
2020-06-29  9:42         ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-06-29 16:15           ` Alan Stern
2020-06-29 16:56             ` Bart Van Assche
2020-06-29 17:40               ` Alan Stern
2020-06-30  3:33             ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-06-30 13:38               ` Alan Stern
2020-06-30 15:59             ` Bart Van Assche
2020-06-30 18:02               ` Alan Stern
2020-06-30 19:23                 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-06-30 19:38                   ` Alan Stern
2020-06-30 23:31                     ` Bart Van Assche
2020-07-01  0:49                       ` Alan Stern
2020-07-06 16:41                         ` Alan Stern
2020-07-28  7:02                           ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-07-28 20:02                             ` Alan Stern
2020-07-29 14:12                               ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-07-29 14:32                                 ` Alan Stern
2020-07-29 14:44                                   ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-07-29 14:56                                     ` Alan Stern
2020-07-29 14:46                                   ` James Bottomley
2020-07-29 14:53                                     ` James Bottomley
2020-07-29 15:40                                       ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-07-29 15:44                                         ` James Bottomley
2020-07-29 16:43                                           ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-07-29 18:25                                             ` Alan Stern
2020-07-29 18:29                                               ` James Bottomley
2020-07-30  8:52                                                 ` Martin Kepplinger [this message]
2020-07-30  8:54                                                   ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-07-30 15:10                                                   ` Alan Stern
2020-08-04  9:39                                                     ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-08-07  9:51                                                       ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-08-07 14:30                                                         ` Alan Stern
2020-08-08  6:59                                                           ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-08-08 15:05                                                             ` Alan Stern
2020-08-09  9:20                                                               ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-08-09 15:26                                                                 ` Alan Stern
2020-08-10 12:03                                                                   ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-08-10 14:13                                                                     ` Alan Stern
2020-08-11  7:55                                                                       ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-08-11 13:48                                                                         ` Alan Stern
2020-08-23 14:57                                                                         ` [PATCH] block: Fix bug in runtime-resume handling Alan Stern
2020-08-24 17:48                                                                           ` Bart Van Assche
2020-08-24 20:13                                                                             ` Alan Stern
2020-08-26  7:48                                                                               ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-08-27 17:42                                                                                 ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-08-27 20:29                                                                                   ` Alan Stern
2020-08-29  7:24                                                                                     ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-08-29 15:26                                                                                       ` Alan Stern
2020-08-29 16:33                                                                                         ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-08-29 18:56                                                                                           ` Alan Stern
2020-08-30  0:38                                                                                             ` Bart Van Assche
2020-08-30  1:06                                                                                               ` Alan Stern
2020-07-29 15:40                                       ` [PATCH] scsi: sd: add runtime pm to open / release Alan Stern
2020-07-29 15:49                                         ` James Bottomley
2020-07-29 16:17                                           ` Alan Stern
2020-07-29 15:52                                         ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-07-29 18:10                                   ` Douglas Gilbert
2020-07-30  8:05             ` Martin Kepplinger
2020-07-30 15:14               ` Alan Stern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d3fe36a9-b785-a5c4-c90d-b8fa10f4272f@puri.sm \
    --to=martin.kepplinger@puri.sm \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=kernel@puri.sm \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).