Il giorno lun, 08/07/2019 alle 11.38 -0400, Alan Stern ha scritto: > > [...] > Andrea, another thing you could try is to collect a usbmon trace > under > > > one of the "slow" kernels. Follow the instructions in > > > Documentation/usb/usbmon.txt. I think you could kill the file- > copy > > > operation after just a couple of seconds; that should provide > enough > > > trace information to help see what causes the slowdown. > > > > > > (If you want, do the same test with a "fast" kernel and then > we'll > > > compare the results.) > > > > > > Alan Stern > > > > > > > Thanks Alan, > > so I attach two ouputs, one for a "good" and one for a "bad" > kernel. > > [...] > I don't know what the results mean, but I _can_ tell you what's > happening. Every so often (at intervals of about a second) the pen > drive completely stops communicating with the "bad" kernel for about > one second and then starts up again. > > Here's a short example from the "bad" trace: > > ffff9169f0d399c0 513072808 S Bo:6:008:2 -115 122880 = 00000000 > 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 > ffff9169f0d399c0 514262176 C Bo:6:008:2 0 122880 > > > The second column is a timestamp (in microseconds). This little > extract shows a 120-KB write starting at time 513.072 and ending at > 514.262, more than a second later. Normally such a write would > complete in about 0.06 s. > > The cumulative effect of all these delays is to slow the transfer > drastically. The "good" kernel trace shows a few delays like this, > but > only one or two. > > I have no idea how commit f664a3cc17b7, getting rid of the legacy > IO > path, could have caused these delays. It seems more likely that > the > pen drive itself is the cause, perhaps because it is flushing > buffers > more often under the "bad" kernel. > > I'd like you to try doing another pair of usbmon tests. This time, > start collecting the usbmon trace _before_ you plug in the pen > drive, > and stop the trace shortly after the pen drive has been mounted. > Don't try to transfer any data. Perhaps the two kernels are > initializing the pen drive with different settings and that accounts > for the different behaviors. Thanks Alan, sorry for the delay (I haven't had physical access to the device for a while). I attach the two new usbmon logs. Meanwhile, I can try with other pendrives, although I already tried two more and both behave "bad" (but one is identical to the first, and the other one is similar). Thanks, and bye Andrea