From: o.evistel@free.fr
To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-sctp <linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux SCTP performance question
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 13:54:12 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1415376250.448838873.1658145252787.JavaMail.zimbra@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220715184858.jnuam6rlhr44ehhw@t14s.localdomain>
Thank you Marcelo for your help.
Omar AIT AMRANE
===================================
----- Mail original -----
De: "Marcelo Ricardo Leitner" <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
À: "o" <o.evistel@free.fr>
Cc: "linux-sctp" <linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org>
Envoyé: Vendredi 15 Juillet 2022 20:48:58
Objet: Re: Linux SCTP performance question
Hi Omar,
Both will end up sending the data with sendmsg(), but sctp_sendv()
will allow more flexibility. Unless you save some syscalls because of
it, performace wise it should be very similar.
Regards,
Marcelo
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 02:58:40PM +0200, o.evistel@free.fr wrote:
> Dear Marcelo
>
> I am using linux-sctp as transport for SIGTRAN M3UA on RHEL 8.4 and I am using sctp_sendmsg() and sctp_recvmsg() to send/receive.
> I would like to know if the use of sctp_sendv() and sctp_recvv() enhances performances ?
>
> Regards
> Omar AIT AMRANE
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-18 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <6f6f11b5c30bce3d6e77d719ef75112dee75250d.profile@marceloleitner.u.sourceforge.net>
2022-07-07 13:39 ` Linux SCTP associations failure handlig Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2022-07-08 14:46 ` o.evistel
2022-07-13 12:58 ` Linux SCTP performance question o.evistel
2022-07-15 18:48 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2022-07-18 11:54 ` o.evistel [this message]
2022-07-16 12:13 ` David Laight
2022-07-18 14:09 ` o.evistel
2022-07-18 14:44 ` David Laight
2022-07-18 14:46 ` David Laight
2024-02-09 10:05 ` Linux SCTP multihoming question o.evistel
2024-02-09 10:10 ` Andreas Fink
2024-02-09 11:01 ` o.evistel
[not found] ` <483A5123-AA38-48EC-8158-120DFFC1E5D8@list.fink.org>
2024-02-09 12:03 ` o.evistel
2024-02-10 17:03 ` David Laight
2024-02-10 17:09 ` Philipp Stanner
2024-02-10 17:34 ` David Laight
2024-02-10 17:48 ` Philipp Stanner
2024-02-10 18:02 ` David Laight
2024-02-10 18:37 ` Philipp Stanner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1415376250.448838873.1658145252787.JavaMail.zimbra@free.fr \
--to=o.evistel@free.fr \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).