From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 16:23:57 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/26] netfilter: switch nf_setsockopt to sockptr_t Message-Id: <20200727162357.GA8022@lst.de> List-Id: References: <20200723060908.50081-1-hch@lst.de> <20200723060908.50081-13-hch@lst.de> <20200727150310.GA1632472@zx2c4.com> <20200727150601.GA3447@lst.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Alexey Kuznetsov , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , Eric Dumazet , Linux Crypto Mailing List , LKML , Netdev , bpf@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, linux-hams@vger.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-can@vger.kernel.org, dccp@vger.kernel.org, linux-decnet-user@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, mptcp@lists.01.org, lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, rds-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-x25@vger.kernel.org, Kernel Hardening On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 06:16:32PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Maybe sockptr_advance should have some safety checks and sometimes > return -EFAULT? Or you should always use the implementation where > being a kernel address is an explicit bit of sockptr_t, rather than > being implicit? I already have a patch to use access_ok to check the whole range in init_user_sockptr.