linux-sctp.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix some seq_file users that were recently broken
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 13:11:45 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210207131145.ea12b9944c54ad2f10932bc3@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210206142924.2bfc3cf5@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>

On Sat, 6 Feb 2021 14:29:24 -0800 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 14:35:50 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 05 Feb 2021 11:36:30 +1100 NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> wrote:
> > 
> > > A recent change to seq_file broke some users which were using seq_file
> > > in a non-"standard" way ...  though the "standard" isn't documented, so
> > > they can be excused.  The result is a possible leak - of memory in one
> > > case, of references to a 'transport' in the other.
> > > 
> > > These three patches:
> > >  1/ document and explain the problem
> > >  2/ fix the problem user in x86
> > >  3/ fix the problem user in net/sctp
> > 
> > 1f4aace60b0e ("fs/seq_file.c: simplify seq_file iteration code and
> > interface") was August 2018, so I don't think "recent" applies here?
> > 
> > I didn't look closely, but it appears that the sctp procfs file is
> > world-readable.  So we gave unprivileged userspace the ability to leak
> > kernel memory?
> > 
> > So I'm thinking that we aim for 5.12-rc1 on all three patches with a cc:stable?
> 
> I'd rather take the sctp patch sooner, we'll send another batch 
> of networking fixes for 5.11, anyway. Would that be okay with you?

Sure.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-07 21:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-05  0:36 [PATCH 0/3] Fix some seq_file users that were recently broken NeilBrown
2021-02-05  0:36 ` [PATCH 3/3] net: fix iteration for sctp transport seq_files NeilBrown
2021-02-05 14:32   ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2021-02-05 22:35 ` [PATCH 0/3] Fix some seq_file users that were recently broken Andrew Morton
2021-02-06 22:29   ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-02-07 21:11     ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2021-02-08 19:42       ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-02-07 22:45   ` NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210207131145.ea12b9944c54ad2f10932bc3@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).