From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ADC2C433EF for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 11:02:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80278611AE for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 11:02:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230365AbhKDLFA (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2021 07:05:00 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:53806 "EHLO mail.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229809AbhKDLE7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2021 07:04:59 -0400 Received: from localhost (cpc147930-brnt3-2-0-cust60.4-2.cable.virginm.net [86.15.196.61]) by mail.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C6B14D2CB6AD; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 04:02:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 11:02:13 +0000 (GMT) Message-Id: <20211104.110213.948977313836077922.davem@davemloft.net> To: paul@paul-moore.com Cc: lucien.xin@gmail.com, omosnace@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, marcelo.leitner@gmail.com, jmorris@namei.org, richard_c_haines@btinternet.com Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net 4/4] security: implement sctp_assoc_established hook in selinux From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 27.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (mail.monkeyblade.net [0.0.0.0]); Thu, 04 Nov 2021 04:02:20 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org From: Paul Moore Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 23:17:00 -0400 > > While I understand you did not intend to mislead DaveM and the netdev > folks with the v2 patchset, your failure to properly manage the > patchset's metadata *did* mislead them and as a result a patchset with > serious concerns from the SELinux side was merged. You need to revert > this patchset while we continue to discuss, develop, and verify a > proper fix that we can all agree on. If you decide not to revert this > patchset I will work with DaveM to do it for you, and that is not > something any of us wants. I would prefer a follow-up rathewr than a revert at this point. Please work with Xin to come up with a fix that works for both of you. Thanks.