From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
To: network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>,
davem@davemloft.net, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
gnault@redhat.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCHv5 net-next 02/16] udp6: move the mss check after udp gso tunnel processing
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:04:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f439ed717442a649ba78dc0efc6f121208a9995.1603955040.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48053c3bf48a46899bc0130dc43adca1e6925581.1603955040.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1603955040.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com>
For some protocol's gso, like SCTP, it's using GSO_BY_FRAGS for
gso_size. When using UDP to encapsulate its packet, it will
return error in udp6_ufo_fragment() as skb->len < gso_size,
and it will never go to the gso tunnel processing.
So we should move this check after udp gso tunnel processing,
the same as udp4_ufo_fragment() does.
v1->v2:
- no change.
v2->v3:
- not do any cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
---
net/ipv6/udp_offload.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/udp_offload.c b/net/ipv6/udp_offload.c
index 584157a..aa602af 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/udp_offload.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/udp_offload.c
@@ -28,10 +28,6 @@ static struct sk_buff *udp6_ufo_fragment(struct sk_buff *skb,
int tnl_hlen;
int err;
- mss = skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_size;
- if (unlikely(skb->len <= mss))
- goto out;
-
if (skb->encapsulation && skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type &
(SKB_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL|SKB_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL_CSUM))
segs = skb_udp_tunnel_segment(skb, features, true);
@@ -48,6 +44,10 @@ static struct sk_buff *udp6_ufo_fragment(struct sk_buff *skb,
if (skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_UDP_L4)
return __udp_gso_segment(skb, features);
+ mss = skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_size;
+ if (unlikely(skb->len <= mss))
+ goto out;
+
/* Do software UFO. Complete and fill in the UDP checksum as HW cannot
* do checksum of UDP packets sent as multiple IP fragments.
*/
--
2.1.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-29 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-29 7:04 [PATCHv5 net-next 00/16] sctp: Implement RFC6951: UDP Encapsulation of SCTP Xin Long
2020-10-29 7:04 ` [PATCHv5 net-next 01/16] udp: check udp sock encap_type in __udp_lib_err Xin Long
2020-10-29 7:04 ` Xin Long [this message]
2020-10-29 7:04 ` [PATCHv5 net-next 03/16] udp: support sctp over udp in skb_udp_tunnel_segment Xin Long
2020-10-29 7:04 ` [PATCHv5 net-next 04/16] sctp: create udp4 sock and add its encap_rcv Xin Long
2020-10-29 7:04 ` [PATCHv5 net-next 05/16] sctp: create udp6 sock and set " Xin Long
2020-10-29 7:05 ` [PATCHv5 net-next 06/16] sctp: add encap_err_lookup for udp encap socks Xin Long
2020-10-29 7:05 ` [PATCHv5 net-next 07/16] sctp: add encap_port for netns sock asoc and transport Xin Long
2020-10-29 7:05 ` [PATCHv5 net-next 08/16] sctp: add SCTP_REMOTE_UDP_ENCAPS_PORT sockopt Xin Long
2020-10-29 7:05 ` [PATCHv5 net-next 09/16] sctp: allow changing transport encap_port by peer packets Xin Long
2020-10-29 7:05 ` [PATCHv5 net-next 10/16] sctp: add udphdr to overhead when udp_port is set Xin Long
2020-10-29 7:05 ` [PATCHv5 net-next 11/16] sctp: call sk_setup_caps in sctp_packet_transmit instead Xin Long
2020-10-29 7:05 ` [PATCHv5 net-next 12/16] sctp: support for sending packet over udp4 sock Xin Long
2020-10-29 7:05 ` [PATCHv5 net-next 13/16] sctp: support for sending packet over udp6 sock Xin Long
2020-10-29 7:05 ` [PATCHv5 net-next 14/16] sctp: add the error cause for new encapsulation port restart Xin Long
2020-10-29 7:05 ` [PATCHv5 net-next 15/16] sctp: handle the init chunk matching an existing asoc Xin Long
2020-10-29 7:05 ` [PATCHv5 net-next 16/16] sctp: enable udp tunneling socks Xin Long
2020-10-29 21:55 ` [PATCHv5 net-next 00/16] sctp: Implement RFC6951: UDP Encapsulation of SCTP Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2020-10-30 23:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4f439ed717442a649ba78dc0efc6f121208a9995.1603955040.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--to=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gnault@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tuexen@fh-muenster.de \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).