linux-sctp.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com>
To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp: account stream padding length for reconf chunk
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 00:17:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <A3FC3A11-C149-4527-84A2-541E951B7A86@nutanix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YWQ43VyG8bF2gvF7@t14s.localdomain>

Hi Marcelo

> On Oct 11, 2021, at 22:15, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
...
> 
> So if stream_num was originally 1, stream_len would be 2, and with
> padding, 4. Here, nums would be 2 then, and not 1. The padding gets
> accounted as if it was payload.
> 
> IOW, the patch is making the padding part of the parameter data by
> adding it to the header as well. SCTP padding works by having it in
> between them, and not inside them.
> 
> This other approach avoids this issue by adding the padding only when
> allocating the packet. It (ab)uses the fact that inreq and outreq are
> already aligned to 4 bytes. Eiichi, can you please give it a go?
> 
> 

Thanks, I understood. I’ve tested your diff with my reproducer and it certainly works.
Your diff looks good to me.

> 
> ---8<---
> 
> diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
> index b8fa8f1a7277..c7503fd64915 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
> @@ -3697,7 +3697,7 @@ struct sctp_chunk *sctp_make_strreset_req(
> 	outlen = (sizeof(outreq) + stream_len) * out;
> 	inlen = (sizeof(inreq) + stream_len) * in;
> 
> -	retval = sctp_make_reconf(asoc, outlen + inlen);
> +	retval = sctp_make_reconf(asoc, SCTP_PAD4(outlen) + SCTP_PAD4(inlen));
> 	if (!retval)
> 		return NULL;

Regards,

Eiichi

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-12  0:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-11  6:42 [PATCH] sctp: account stream padding length for reconf chunk Greg KH
2021-10-11 13:15 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2021-10-12  0:17   ` Eiichi Tsukata [this message]
2021-10-13 15:31     ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=A3FC3A11-C149-4527-84A2-541E951B7A86@nutanix.com \
    --to=eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).