From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A04C433ED for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 19:10:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C0A61494 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 19:10:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233133AbhEJTLm (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 May 2021 15:11:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42740 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232133AbhEJTLm (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 May 2021 15:11:42 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x432.google.com (mail-wr1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::432]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 023CAC061574; Mon, 10 May 2021 12:10:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x432.google.com with SMTP id v12so17715436wrq.6; Mon, 10 May 2021 12:10:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=6+bq4nz+rZlWKieQDXLrXiknC/+/2IQfRO3qKHir+Kg=; b=LY9p9K5BwwB2LmZt6kOYadgROb/UJxgjqG81lSxqcud8iouZ8881V9Gxhpwg7SgH5W VPW/j9lg0ijIENiHjFPFkE2cnTQ2alcttpOxvs23v6e6ZpOYLosDWYoJ6rAN4hNZ44AK st/RPe2W1HlhkYDrYIUUIy75w5krEcITdq5pHlTKUFBxx5Fy1o3wz38kqKGWmTsGUIzb rbQMqUmfkED6mXQUvWJXF7z2KDBX36XiUbXjSugZUqVY6y71MqlKUJByxxvycOGOEN9b VOZk9R5lIsggTTQ3ENpUq4I6xbPT/rs3yrir6sHRbDIbvSVDKvaS9M0QL1u1iCvX/ILm K5SQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=6+bq4nz+rZlWKieQDXLrXiknC/+/2IQfRO3qKHir+Kg=; b=qiHDwFGgIcZRO75C7IoZtaLpuPYUoIVJTxs7Q+tGrlZ4QLBfUPVp4LtF+GsA9nvZiF Z6DLI0Rd/+B1Twzyv+alKr9tUtKxW41DAPL+BJjXMCdF0KV/GkxXZYAHlvkbw/oMbf3t kUSTpWZ0ckUfLPKQVRPYh1GBUJlboEGI+HJjH6U4cyFAr2sh+cZuNXTregNU8TeHe7kM a974KQbVPPC6z8qbT+q7mZSVmcsElxQI4nKR4s1PiZB8ODgSEGR2V5AdMdUH2uJNYevh tlAnu1h1soO1R1pZnIJo6p/R8j44+53LXUEf0W+7+zFoazJ+abSD020Zst6frBCAEhg6 cbcA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5315Mukkvk8uXGpvpYWPVumAaRqdhcVxq4H5/kM1nZPFMLtKra6l Eq7a7TN9WdahLMUaTjFinLU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzj0blzMZ1JdWdOAIGXMGxRDJTwHcz2f80yGo3HTnWvcTU04b2Mm8+c9uY/GSdGQQL8+wpHoA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e40c:: with SMTP id g12mr31973827wrm.11.1620673835643; Mon, 10 May 2021 12:10:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eldamar (80-218-24-251.dclient.hispeed.ch. [80.218.24.251]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r7sm19251571wmq.18.2021.05.10.12.10.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 10 May 2021 12:10:34 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Salvatore Bonaccorso Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 21:10:33 +0200 From: Salvatore Bonaccorso To: Xin Long Cc: network dev , linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner , Or Cohen Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] sctp: fix the race condition in sctp_destroy_sock in a proper way Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org Hi Xin, On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 05:11:40AM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > The original fix introduced a dead lock, and has to be removed in > Patch 1/2, and we will get a proper way to fix it in Patch 2/2. > > Xin Long (2): > Revert "net/sctp: fix race condition in sctp_destroy_sock" > sctp: delay auto_asconf init until binding the first addr > > net/sctp/socket.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) The original commit which got reverted in this series, was already applied to several stable series, namely all of 4.4.268, 4.9.268, 4.14.232, 4.19.189, 5.4.114, 5.10.32, 5.11.16. Is it planned to do the revert and bugfix in those as well? Regards, Salvatore