From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 471FDC433EF for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2022 17:48:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239986AbiBCRsj (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Feb 2022 12:48:39 -0500 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de ([195.135.220.28]:48842 "EHLO smtp-out1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232884AbiBCRsi (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Feb 2022 12:48:38 -0500 Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E68CB21123; Thu, 3 Feb 2022 17:48:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1643910517; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=4evBO+POjQzamNc4DHb8Bx/EMzfDWMdsaLbNmOWVCa0=; b=sS5h+fqayr9QJBnAV9sYn/AtXlxnjyEy2lVAShVgNmoPDPeLECJa9QcDjd2aKnsW7hGX1O 8VokbGeSjNX8FeitrahWGjzplq6rB8emKl9pMpxD+5OfBVsdDbDn5N+vBjH9pqkUt5+n+X FJ6inRnHaALIP9dxoCndYZ/GwaDU3SY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1643910517; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=4evBO+POjQzamNc4DHb8Bx/EMzfDWMdsaLbNmOWVCa0=; b=DJHNapkDoLtoeSVafMudNSqU3g8JEDtx4aacYoHeQgNDswhxFxqi0gN9xI5ugY2b3EoBP8 bVP3Syxe73c4AiBw== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0568513671; Thu, 3 Feb 2022 17:48:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id nSj0OnQV/GEbTAAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Thu, 03 Feb 2022 17:48:36 +0000 Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 18:48:35 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: automated-testing@lists.yoctoproject.org Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, Richard Purdie , Marcelo Ricardo Leitner , Neil Horman , Vlad Yasevich , Xin Long , Anders Roxell , Philip Li , Tim Bird , Cyril Hrubis , Li Wang , Jan Stancek , Baruch Siach , Erico Nunes , Kory Maincent , Thomas Petazzoni , Veronika Kabatova , Joerg Vehlow Subject: SCTP testing Message-ID: Reply-To: Petr Vorel MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org Hi all, we've been just discussing, which repository should be hosting SCTP tests [1]. Do you use these SCTP tests? If yes, do you use it from LTP [2] or the official SCTP kernel developers repository [3] ? If you use integrated to some testing framework, would it be a problem if repository changes? Also, do you use LTP network tests at all? Kind regards, Petr [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sctp/YfpnVfrto4Elshy5@pevik/ [2] https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/tree/master/utils/sctp [3] https://github.com/sctp/lksctp-tools