From: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: keescook@chromium.org, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp,
paul@paul-moore.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: [PATCH v3 10/24] Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 11:39:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <015a98ed-1099-0da6-8fde-b25860d626ad@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190621185233.6766-11-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
On 6/21/19 11:52 AM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> There may be more than one LSM that provides IPC data
> for auditing. Change security_ipc_getsecid() to fill in
> a lsmblob structure instead of the u32 secid. The
> audit data structure containing the secid will be updated
> later, so there is a bit of scaffolding here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
> ---
> include/linux/security.h | 7 ++++---
> kernel/auditsc.c | 5 ++++-
> security/security.c | 9 ++++++---
> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
> index c6cddeff8a17..0d5e172341fc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/security.h
> +++ b/include/linux/security.h
> @@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ int security_task_prctl(int option, unsigned long arg2, unsigned long arg3,
> unsigned long arg4, unsigned long arg5);
> void security_task_to_inode(struct task_struct *p, struct inode *inode);
> int security_ipc_permission(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp, short flag);
> -void security_ipc_getsecid(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp, u32 *secid);
> +void security_ipc_getsecid(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp, struct lsmblob *blob);
> int security_msg_msg_alloc(struct msg_msg *msg);
> void security_msg_msg_free(struct msg_msg *msg);
> int security_msg_queue_alloc(struct kern_ipc_perm *msq);
> @@ -1098,9 +1098,10 @@ static inline int security_ipc_permission(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static inline void security_ipc_getsecid(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp, u32 *secid)
> +static inline void security_ipc_getsecid(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp,
> + struct lsmblob *blob)
> {
> - *secid = 0;
> + lsmblob_init(blob, 0);
> }
>
> static inline int security_msg_msg_alloc(struct msg_msg *msg)
> diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
> index d31914088a82..148733ec3c72 100644
> --- a/kernel/auditsc.c
> +++ b/kernel/auditsc.c
> @@ -2268,11 +2268,14 @@ void __audit_mq_getsetattr(mqd_t mqdes, struct mq_attr *mqstat)
> void __audit_ipc_obj(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp)
> {
> struct audit_context *context = audit_context();
> + struct lsmblob blob;
> context->ipc.uid = ipcp->uid;
> context->ipc.gid = ipcp->gid;
> context->ipc.mode = ipcp->mode;
> context->ipc.has_perm = 0;
> - security_ipc_getsecid(ipcp, &context->ipc.osid);
> + security_ipc_getsecid(ipcp, &blob);
> + /* scaffolding on the [0] - change "osid" to a lsmblob */
> + context->ipc.osid = blob.secid[0];
> context->type = AUDIT_IPC;
> }
>
> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index 5ab07631df75..d55f01041f05 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -1812,10 +1812,13 @@ int security_ipc_permission(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp, short flag)
> return call_int_hook(ipc_permission, 0, ipcp, flag);
> }
>
> -void security_ipc_getsecid(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp, u32 *secid)
> +void security_ipc_getsecid(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp, struct lsmblob *blob)
> {
> - *secid = 0;
> - call_void_hook(ipc_getsecid, ipcp, secid);
> + struct security_hook_list *hp;
> +
> + lsmblob_init(blob, 0);
> + hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.ipc_getsecid, list)
> + hp->hook.ipc_getsecid(ipcp, &blob->secid[hp->slot]);
> }
>
> int security_msg_msg_alloc(struct msg_msg *msg)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-24 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-21 18:52 [PATCH v3 00/24] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 01/24] LSM: Infrastructure management of the superblock Casey Schaufler
2019-06-24 18:31 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 02/24] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2019-06-24 18:33 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 03/24] LSM: Infrastructure management of the key blob Casey Schaufler
2019-06-24 18:33 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 04/24] LSM: Create and manage the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:42 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 18:38 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 05/24] Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:43 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 18:39 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 06/24] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:43 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 18:38 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 07/24] net: Prepare UDS for secuirty module stacking Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:43 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 18:39 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 08/24] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:44 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 18:38 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 09/24] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:44 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 18:39 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 10/24] Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:48 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 16:39 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-24 17:20 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-24 21:09 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 18:39 ` John Johansen [this message]
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 11/24] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_task_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:49 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 18:40 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 12/24] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:49 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 18:40 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 13/24] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:50 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 18:40 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 14/24] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:51 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 18:40 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 15/24] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:51 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 18:48 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 16/24] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:52 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 21:46 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 17/24] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:52 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 21:46 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 18/24] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_dentry_init_security Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:54 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 21:46 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 19/24] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:56 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 21:46 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 20/24] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 22:57 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 21:47 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 21/24] Audit: Store LSM audit information in an lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 23:12 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 21:33 ` John Johansen
2019-06-25 1:01 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-25 1:46 ` Paul Moore
2019-06-25 2:14 ` John Johansen
2019-06-25 2:42 ` Paul Moore
2019-06-25 15:30 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 22/24] LSM: Return the lsmblob slot on initialization Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 23:13 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 21:39 ` John Johansen
2019-06-24 21:50 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 21:53 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-24 21:47 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 23/24] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 23:15 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 21:44 ` John Johansen
2019-06-21 18:52 ` [PATCH v3 24/24] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
2019-06-22 23:15 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-24 21:45 ` John Johansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=015a98ed-1099-0da6-8fde-b25860d626ad@canonical.com \
--to=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).