linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: keescook@chromium.org, john.johansen@canonical.com,
	penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, paul@paul-moore.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 22/23] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 13:54:45 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <09d96236-715a-344a-38bc-c05208698125@tycho.nsa.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <446935fa-2926-c346-a273-ae1ecbb072cd@schaufler-ca.com>

On 1/31/20 5:10 PM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>  From c4085435215653b7c4d07a35a9df308120441d79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
> Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 13:57:23 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH v14] LSM: Move "context" format enforcement into security
>   modules
> 
> Document in lsm_hooks.h what is expected of a security module that
> supplies the "context" attribute.  Add handling of the "context"
> attribute to SELinux, Smack and AppArmor security modules. The
> AppArmor implementation provides a different string for "context"
> than it does for other attributes to conform with the "context"
> format.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
> ---
>   include/linux/lsm_hooks.h            |  6 ++++++
>   security/apparmor/include/procattr.h |  2 +-
>   security/apparmor/lsm.c              |  8 ++++++--
>   security/apparmor/procattr.c         | 11 +++++++----
>   security/security.c                  |  2 +-
>   security/selinux/hooks.c             |  2 +-
>   security/smack/smack_lsm.c           |  2 +-
>   7 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> index 2bf82e1cf347..61977a33f2c3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> @@ -1321,6 +1321,12 @@
>    *	@pages contains the number of pages.
>    *	Return 0 if permission is granted.
>    *
> + * @getprocattr:
> + *	Provide the named process attribute for display in special files in
> + *	the /proc/.../attr directory.  Attribute naming and the data displayed
> + *	is at the discretion of the security modules.  The exception is the
> + *	"context" attribute, which will contain the security context of the
> + *	task as a nul terminated text string without trailing whitespace.

I'd suggest something like the following instead:
* @getprocattr
*   Get the value of process attribute @name for task @p into a buffer
*   allocated by the security module and returned via @value.  The
*   caller will free the returned buffer via kfree.  The set of
*   attribute names is fixed by proc but the format of @value is up
*   to the security module authors except for the "context" attribute,
*   whose value is required to be a NUL-terminated printable ASCII
*   string without trailing whitespace.
*   @p the task whose attribute is being fetched
*   @name the name of the process attribute being fetched
*   @value set to point to the buffer containing the attribute value
*   Return the length of @value including the NUL on success, or -errno 
on error.

The printable ASCII bit is based on what the dbus maintainer requested 
in previous discussions.  The question of whether the terminating NUL 
should be included in the returned length was otherwise left ambiguous 
and inconsistent in your patch among the different security modules; if 
you prefer not including it in the length returned by the security 
modules, you'll need to adjust SELinux at least to not do so for "context".

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-03 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20200124002306.3552-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2020-01-24  0:22 ` [PATCH v14 00/23] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2020-01-24  0:22   ` [PATCH v14 01/23] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2020-01-24  0:22   ` [PATCH v14 02/23] LSM: Create and manage the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2020-01-24 14:21     ` Stephen Smalley
2020-01-24  0:22   ` [PATCH v14 03/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2020-01-24  0:22   ` [PATCH v14 04/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2020-01-24  0:22   ` [PATCH v14 05/23] net: Prepare UDS for security module stacking Casey Schaufler
2020-01-24  0:22   ` [PATCH v14 06/23] Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2020-01-24 14:29     ` Stephen Smalley
2020-01-24  0:22   ` [PATCH v14 07/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2020-01-24  0:22   ` [PATCH v14 08/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-01-24  0:22   ` [PATCH v14 09/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_task_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-01-24  0:22   ` [PATCH v14 10/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-01-24  0:22   ` [PATCH v14 11/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-01-24  0:22   ` [PATCH v14 12/23] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs Casey Schaufler
2020-01-24  0:22   ` [PATCH v14 13/23] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2020-01-24  0:22   ` [PATCH v14 14/23] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2020-01-24  0:22   ` [PATCH v14 15/23] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2020-01-24  0:22   ` [PATCH v14 16/23] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2020-01-24  0:23   ` [PATCH v14 17/23] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2020-01-24  0:23   ` [PATCH v14 18/23] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2020-01-24 14:36     ` Stephen Smalley
2020-01-24  0:23   ` [PATCH v14 19/23] LSM: Verify LSM display sanity in binder Casey Schaufler
2020-01-24  0:23   ` [PATCH v14 20/23] Audit: Add subj_LSM fields when necessary Casey Schaufler
2020-01-24  0:23   ` [PATCH v14 21/23] Audit: Include object data for all security modules Casey Schaufler
2020-01-24  0:23   ` [PATCH v14 22/23] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context Casey Schaufler
2020-01-24 14:42     ` Stephen Smalley
2020-01-24 16:20       ` Stephen Smalley
2020-01-24 19:28         ` Casey Schaufler
2020-01-24 20:16           ` Stephen Smalley
2020-01-27 20:05             ` Simon McVittie
2020-02-03 20:54               ` John Johansen
2020-01-27 22:49             ` Casey Schaufler
2020-01-31 22:10             ` Casey Schaufler
2020-02-03 18:54               ` Stephen Smalley [this message]
2020-02-03 19:37                 ` Stephen Smalley
2020-02-03 21:39                   ` Casey Schaufler
2020-02-04 13:37                     ` Stephen Smalley
2020-02-04 17:14                       ` Casey Schaufler
2020-02-10 11:56                 ` Simon McVittie
2020-02-10 13:25                   ` Stephen Smalley
2020-02-10 14:55                     ` Stephen Smalley
2020-02-10 18:32                       ` Casey Schaufler
2020-02-10 19:00                         ` John Johansen
2020-02-11 15:59                           ` Stephen Smalley
2020-02-11 17:58                             ` John Johansen
2020-02-11 18:35                               ` Casey Schaufler
2020-02-11 19:11                                 ` John Johansen
2020-02-10 18:56                       ` John Johansen
2020-02-03 21:02             ` John Johansen
2020-02-03 21:43               ` Casey Schaufler
2020-02-03 22:49                 ` John Johansen
2020-02-03 20:59           ` John Johansen
2020-01-24  0:23   ` [PATCH v14 23/23] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
2020-01-24 15:05   ` [PATCH v14 00/23] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Stephen Smalley
2020-01-24 21:04   ` Stephen Smalley
2020-01-24 21:49     ` Casey Schaufler
2020-01-27 16:14       ` Stephen Smalley
2020-01-27 16:56         ` KASAN slab-out-of-bounds in tun_chr_open/sock_init_data (Was: Re: [PATCH v14 00/23] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor) Stephen Smalley
2020-01-27 17:34           ` Casey Schaufler
2020-01-27 17:16         ` [PATCH v14 00/23] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=09d96236-715a-344a-38bc-c05208698125@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --to=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).