linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com, raven@themaw.net,
	Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
	dhowells@redhat.com, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 06/11] pipe: Advance tail pointer inside of wait spinlock in pipe_read() [ver #3]
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 17:34:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <157262969721.13142.294641621235161592.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <157262963995.13142.5568934007158044624.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

Advance the pipe ring tail pointer inside of wait spinlock in pipe_read()
so that the pipe can be written into with kernel notifications from
contexts where pipe->mutex cannot be taken.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---

 fs/pipe.c |    8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/pipe.c b/fs/pipe.c
index 69afeab8a73a..ea134f69a292 100644
--- a/fs/pipe.c
+++ b/fs/pipe.c
@@ -325,9 +325,14 @@ pipe_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
 
 			if (!buf->len) {
 				pipe_buf_release(pipe, buf);
+				spin_lock_irq(&pipe->wait.lock);
 				tail++;
 				pipe->tail = tail;
-				do_wakeup = 1;
+				do_wakeup = 0;
+				wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll_locked(
+					&pipe->wait, EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM);
+				spin_unlock_irq(&pipe->wait.lock);
+				kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_writers, SIGIO, POLL_OUT);
 			}
 			total_len -= chars;
 			if (!total_len)
@@ -359,6 +364,7 @@ pipe_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
 		if (do_wakeup) {
 			wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->wait, EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM);
  			kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_writers, SIGIO, POLL_OUT);
+			do_wakeup = 0;
 		}
 		pipe_wait(pipe);
 	}


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-01 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-01 17:34 [RFC PATCH 00/11] pipe: Notification queue preparation [ver #3] David Howells
2019-11-01 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] pipe: Reduce #inclusion of pipe_fs_i.h " David Howells
2019-11-01 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] Remove the nr_exclusive argument from __wake_up_sync_key() " David Howells
2019-11-01 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] Add wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll_locked() " David Howells
2019-11-01 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] pipe: Use head and tail pointers for the ring, not cursor and length " David Howells
     [not found]   ` <20191107090306.GV29418@shao2-debian>
2019-11-07 16:51     ` [pipe] d60337eff1: phoronix-test-suite.noise-level.0.activity_level 144.0% improvement Linus Torvalds
2019-11-07 17:42     ` David Howells
2019-11-01 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] pipe: Allow pipes to have kernel-reserved slots [ver #3] David Howells
2019-11-01 17:34 ` David Howells [this message]
2019-11-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] pipe: Conditionalise wakeup in pipe_read() " David Howells
2019-11-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] pipe: Rearrange sequence in pipe_write() to preallocate slot " David Howells
2019-11-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] pipe: Remove redundant wakeup from pipe_write() " David Howells
2019-11-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] pipe: Check for ring full inside of the spinlock in " David Howells
2019-11-01 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] pipe: Increase the writer-wakeup threshold to reduce context-switch count " David Howells
2019-11-01 19:24 ` [RFC PATCH 00/11] pipe: Notification queue preparation " Linus Torvalds
2019-11-01 22:05 ` David Howells
2019-11-01 22:12   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-11-05 16:02 ` Details on the UAPI of implementing notifications on pipes David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=157262969721.13142.294641621235161592.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=christian@brauner.io \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=raven@themaw.net \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).