From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: keescook@chromium.org, john.johansen@canonical.com,
penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, paul@paul-moore.com,
sds@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 03/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 13:26:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1582568814.10443.149.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200214234203.7086-4-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
On Fri, 2020-02-14 at 15:41 -0800, Casey Schaufler wrote:
<snip>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> index 624ed1a34842..ad48b7b60cff 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> @@ -476,6 +476,7 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
> for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
> int rc = 0;
> u32 osid;
> + struct lsmblob blob;
A new local lsmblob variable is defined here with the same name as the
function variable.
Mimi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-24 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20200214234203.7086-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 00/23] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 01/23] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2020-03-06 20:37 ` Paul Moore
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 02/23] LSM: Create and manage the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2020-02-18 17:56 ` Stephen Smalley
2020-02-24 17:56 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 03/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2020-02-24 18:26 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 04/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2020-03-06 22:06 ` Paul Moore
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 05/23] net: Prepare UDS for security module stacking Casey Schaufler
2020-03-06 22:14 ` Paul Moore
2020-03-10 0:13 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-03-10 1:02 ` Paul Moore
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 06/23] Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2020-03-07 0:58 ` Paul Moore
2020-03-10 1:13 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 07/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 08/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 09/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_task_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 10/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 11/23] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 12/23] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 13/23] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2020-03-07 1:49 ` Paul Moore
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 14/23] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 15/23] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 16/23] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 17/23] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2020-03-07 2:06 ` Paul Moore
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 18/23] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2020-03-07 2:14 ` Paul Moore
2020-03-10 1:21 ` Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:41 ` [PATCH v15 19/23] LSM: Verify LSM display sanity in binder Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:42 ` [PATCH v15 20/23] Audit: Add subj_LSM fields when necessary Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:42 ` [PATCH v15 21/23] Audit: Include object data for all security modules Casey Schaufler
2020-02-14 23:42 ` [PATCH v15 22/23] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context Casey Schaufler
2020-02-18 18:17 ` Stephen Smalley
2020-02-14 23:42 ` [PATCH v15 23/23] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
2020-02-18 18:19 ` Stephen Smalley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1582568814.10443.149.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).