From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva02@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] ima: Move validation of the keyrings conditional into ima_validate_rule()
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 10:15:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1593785732.23056.16.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200702221656.GH4694@sequoia>
On Thu, 2020-07-02 at 17:16 -0500, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> On 2020-06-30 19:07:29, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > On Fri, 2020-06-26 at 17:38 -0500, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> > > Use ima_validate_rule() to ensure that the combination of a hook
> > > function and the keyrings conditional is valid and that the keyrings
> > > conditional is not specified without an explicit KEY_CHECK func
> > > conditional. This is a code cleanup and has no user-facing change.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > * v2
> > > - Allowed IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED, IMA_PERMIT_DIRECTIO,
> > > IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED, and IMA_CHECK_BLACKLIST conditionals to be
> > > present in the rule entry flags for non-buffer hook functions.
> > >
> > > security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> > > index 8cdca2399d59..43d49ad958fb 100644
> > > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> > > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> > > @@ -1000,6 +1000,15 @@ static bool ima_validate_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
> > > case KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK:
> > > case KEXEC_INITRAMFS_CHECK:
> > > case POLICY_CHECK:
> > > + if (entry->flags & ~(IMA_FUNC | IMA_MASK | IMA_FSMAGIC |
> > > + IMA_UID | IMA_FOWNER | IMA_FSUUID |
> > > + IMA_INMASK | IMA_EUID | IMA_PCR |
> > > + IMA_FSNAME | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED |
> > > + IMA_PERMIT_DIRECTIO |
> > > + IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED |
> > > + IMA_CHECK_BLACKLIST))
> >
> > Other than KEYRINGS, this patch should continue to behave the same.
> > However, this list gives the impressions that all of these flags are
> > permitted on all of the above flags, which isn't true.
> >
> > For example, both IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED & IMA_CHECK_BLACKLIST are limited
> > to appended signatures, meaning KERNEL_CHECK and KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK.
>
> Just to clarify, are both IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED and IMA_CHECK_BLACKLIST
> limited to KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK, KEXEC_INITRAMFS_CHECK, and MODULE_CHECK?
> That's what ima_hook_supports_modsig() suggests.
Theoretically that is true, but I have no idea how you would append a
signature to the kexec boot command line. The only users of appended
signatures are currently kernel modules and the kexec'ed kernel image.
>
> > Both should only be allowed on APPRAISE action rules.
>
> For completeness, it looks like DONT_APPRAISE should not be allowed.
Good point.
>
> > IMA_PCR should be limited to MEASURE action rules.
>
> It looks like DONT_MEASURE should not be allowed.
The TPM PCR isn't a file attribute.
>
> > IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED should be limited to APPRAISE action rules.
>
> It looks like DONT_APPRAISE should not be allowed.
Right, in all of these cases the DONT_XXXX isn't applicable.
Mimi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-03 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-26 22:38 [PATCH v2 00/11] ima: Fix rule parsing bugs and extend KEXEC_CMDLINE rule support Tyler Hicks
2020-06-26 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] ima: Have the LSM free its audit rule Tyler Hicks
2020-06-26 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] ima: Free the entire rule when deleting a list of rules Tyler Hicks
2020-06-26 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] ima: Free the entire rule if it fails to parse Tyler Hicks
2020-06-26 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] ima: Fail rule parsing when buffer hook functions have an invalid action Tyler Hicks
2020-06-26 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] ima: Fail rule parsing when the KEXEC_CMDLINE hook is combined with an invalid cond Tyler Hicks
2020-06-27 23:40 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2020-06-26 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] ima: Fail rule parsing when the KEY_CHECK " Tyler Hicks
2020-06-27 23:39 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2020-06-26 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] ima: Shallow copy the args_p member of ima_rule_entry.lsm elements Tyler Hicks
2020-06-26 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] ima: Use correct type for " Tyler Hicks
2020-06-26 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] ima: Move validation of the keyrings conditional into ima_validate_rule() Tyler Hicks
2020-06-27 23:49 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2020-06-29 14:16 ` Tyler Hicks
2020-06-30 23:07 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-07-02 22:16 ` Tyler Hicks
2020-07-03 14:15 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2020-07-06 13:18 ` Tyler Hicks
2020-07-07 3:18 ` Mimi Zohar
2020-06-26 22:38 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] ima: Use the common function to detect LSM conditionals in a rule Tyler Hicks
2020-06-26 22:39 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] ima: Support additional conditionals in the KEXEC_CMDLINE hook function Tyler Hicks
2020-06-28 0:03 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2020-07-01 8:04 ` Dave Young
2020-07-01 14:38 ` Tyler Hicks
2020-07-01 0:29 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] ima: Fix rule parsing bugs and extend KEXEC_CMDLINE rule support Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1593785732.23056.16.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=prsriva02@gmail.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).